Keywords: Dementia Prevention, Handstand, Cerebral Blood Flow, Vestibular Cognition, Neuroprotection, Balance Training, Cognitive Reserve, Alzheimer’s Disease
Introduction
Dementia is no longer a condition of quiet individual tragedy , it is a civilisational crisis. With more than 57 million people living with dementia globally and new cases diagnosed every three seconds, the disorder now ranks among the top three causes of death and disability-adjusted life years in older adults. The economic cost alone exceeds US$1.3 trillion annually, a figure projected to more than double by 2030 as demographic ageing accelerates across both high- and lower-income nations . Despite decades of intensive pharmaceutical research, not a single disease-modifying therapy has demonstrated robust, reproducible clinical efficacy in arresting the progression of Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia. The result is a scientific imperative: attention must pivot decisively toward prevention [1,2,3].
The 2020 Lancet Commission on Dementia Prevention, Intervention and Care identified twelve modifiable risk factors, including physical inactivity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and social isolation, collectively accounting for approximately 40% of dementia cases worldwide . Of these, physical inactivity stands out as both highly prevalent and highly amenable to intervention. Meta-analyses and longitudinal cohort studies consistently demonstrate that regular physical activity reduces dementia incidence by 28 to 45%, depending on modality, intensity, and duration. The biological mechanisms underpinning this effect like neurotrophin upregulation, cerebrovascular enhancement, neurogenesis, and inflammatory suppression are increasingly well characterised [2,4,5,6,7].
Yet within the broad category of “physical activity,” most research has focused on conventional aerobic modalities (walking, cycling, running) or structured resistance training. A vast and mechanistically compelling territory remains largely uninvestigated: inversion-based exercise, and in particular the handstand. Practised across gymnastics, calisthenics, yoga (adho mukha vrksasana), and acrobatics, the handstand uniquely combines aerobic effort, isometric strength, vestibular challenge, proprioceptive richness, and intense attentional demand in a single integrated movement. It is, in essence, a multi-system neurological workout hiding in plain sight.
This narrative review assembles current evidence from exercise neuroscience, cerebrovascular physiology, vestibular biology, neuroendocrinology, and cognitive neuroscience to construct a mechanistic argument for handstand practice as a neuroprotective intervention against dementia. We discuss each contributing mechanism independently before examining how their convergence in the handstand may generate synergistic benefits unavailable to single-modality exercises. We also address clinical translation, safety considerations, and priority areas for future research. It is our contention that the handstand is not merely an athletic feat , it is, quite literally, putting your brain first.
Dementia: Global Burden, Pathophysiology, and The Case For Lifestyle Intervention
Dementia describes a clinical syndrome of progressive cognitive decline severe enough to interfere with daily functioning, encompassing Alzheimer’s disease (accounting for 60–70% of cases), vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and mixed pathologies. At the cellular level, Alzheimer’s disease is characterised by the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau neurofibrillary tangles, alongside mitochondrial dysfunction, synaptic loss, and widespread neuroinflammation. Vascular dementia, the second most common subtype, shares key mechanistic ground with metabolic and cardiovascular disease, chronic cerebrovascular insufficiency, white matter hyperintensities, and endothelial dysfunction, making it particularly amenable to haemodynamically targeted interventions [3,8,9].
Brain regions most vulnerable to early dementia pathology, the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and prefrontal cortex are also among those most responsive to exercise-induced neurobiological change. The hippocampus, critical for episodic memory formation and spatial navigation, demonstrates measurable volumetric growth following aerobic exercise training, a finding replicated across multiple randomised controlled trials. This neuroplasticity is mediated in part by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neurotrophic protein whose systemic levels are upregulated by both aerobic and resistance exercise [6,10,11,12].
The relationship between metabolic health and dementia risk further strengthens the case for exercise-based prevention. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a two-fold increase in dementia risk, and central adiposity in midlife predicts late-life cognitive decline independent of cardiovascular disease. Exercise’s capacity to improve insulin sensitivity, reduce visceral adiposity, lower systemic inflammation, and normalise lipid profiles positions it as a multi-target preventive agent that directly addresses the metabolic-cognitive interface, a nexus of particular relevance to this organisation’s core research mission in metabolic wellness [4,13,14].
The Handstand: An Ancient Movement With Modern Neurological Significance
The handstand, the act of balancing the entire body vertically over the hands, is one of the oldest known physical practices in human history, documented in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, Chinese acrobatics, and Greek athletic traditions. In the modern era it forms a foundational element of artistic gymnastics, breakdancing, yoga, and the growing global calisthenics movement. Its physiological demands are multidimensional: successful execution requires substantial upper extremity and scapular strength, core and spinal stability, acute proprioceptive sensitivity, vestibular recalibration to an inverted gravitational environment, and sustained attentional focus [15].
From a neurological standpoint, the handstand is unusual among exercise forms in that it simultaneously inverts the body relative to gravity (engaging haemodynamic and vestibular mechanisms), demands continuous dynamic balance (engaging cerebellar, proprioceptive, and cortical motor circuits), and requires intense concentration (engaging prefrontal attentional networks). This convergence of stimuli is not found in walking, running, cycling, or conventional resistance training. Even within yoga, most inversions such as the shoulder stand (sarvangasana) or headstand (sirsasana) achieve a subset of these demands; the handstand alone requires full integration of all of them simultaneously.
Importantly, the handstand exists on a spectrum of accessibility. Wall-assisted handstands, forearm stands, and pike push-up progressions allow individuals of varying fitness levels to engage the mechanistic benefits of inversion without requiring the skill level of a gymnast. This scalability is critical when considering clinical translation for older adults or individuals with metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities. Modified inversion protocols, even partial inversions such as downward-facing dog (adho mukha svanasana) may capture a meaningful proportion of the haemodynamic and vestibular benefits while presenting manageable physical demands [16].
Cerebral Hemodynamics in Inversion: Gravitational Enhancement of Brain Perfusion
Perhaps the most immediately intuitive neuroprotective mechanism of the handstand is its effect on cerebral blood flow. In the standard upright posture, the brain sits approximately 30–40 cm above the heart, requiring the cardiovascular system to overcome significant hydrostatic pressure to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion 17. This gravitational load on cerebrovascular circulation is particularly relevant in ageing, where declining cardiac output, arterial stiffening, and impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation progressively reduce the brain’s haemodynamic reserve [18].
Inversion reverses this gravitational gradient. When the body is inverted, the brain descends below the level of the heart, and hydrostatic pressure now augments rather than opposes cerebral perfusion. Studies using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and near-infrared spectroscopy have documented significant increases in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and prefrontal oxygenation during head-down tilt and inversion exercises. Although the magnitude of flow increase is subject to autoregulatory dampening, the brain actively buffers excessive pressure elevations, the net effect is a transient but meaningful enhancement of cerebral perfusion, particularly in watershed zones susceptible to ischaemic injury [17,18].
Chronic exposure to repeated inversion bouts may confer lasting cerebrovascular adaptations. Regular aerobic exercise is known to enhance endothelial function, increase cerebral vessel density, and expand the cerebrovascular reserve, the brain’s capacity to increase blood flow in response to increased metabolic demand [19]. The repeated haemodynamic challenge imposed by inversion may act as a form of “cerebrovascular training,” promoting endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) upregulation, arterial compliance, and angiogenesis in a manner analogous to the cardiovascular adaptations seen with aerobic conditioning [19,20]. In the context of vascular dementia, where cerebrovascular insufficiency is the primary pathological driver , this mechanism is of direct clinical relevance.
It is important to acknowledge that prolonged or extreme inversion carries risks in specific populations, including those with uncontrolled hypertension, glaucoma, or retinal pathology, where elevated intracranial or intraocular pressure may be harmful.
Brain-Derived Neuroprotrophic Factor: The Molecular Bridge Between Exercise and Neuroprotection
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophin family that plays a central role in the survival, differentiation, and synaptic plasticity of neurons throughout the central nervous system. It is the most extensively studied molecular mediator linking physical exercise to cognitive health, and its relevance to dementia is well established: BDNF levels are significantly reduced in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease, and BDNF polymorphisms that reduce secretion are associated with accelerated hippocampal atrophy and memory decline [11,12,21].
Meta-analytic evidence robustly supports exercise as a potent stimulus for BDNF upregulation. A 2015 meta-analysis by Szuhany and colleagues, encompassing 29 studies, reported that both acute bouts and chronic exercise training significantly increased peripheral BDNF concentrations, with effect sizes particularly pronounced for aerobic exercise at moderate-to-high intensities. BDNF released from the working muscles (as irisin-mediated BDNF induction) and from within the brain itself promotes hippocampal neurogenesis, synaptic potentiation, and neuronal survival, mechanistic events directly linked to the preservation of episodic memory and executive function [7,11].
The handstand engages both aerobic and resistance components, the sustained isometric effort of maintaining the inverted position, combined with the cardiovascular demand of achieving and holding it, activates both the neuromuscular and metabolic pathways that drive BDNF release. Additionally, the novelty and skill-acquisition demands of learning the handstand, particularly during the weeks and months of progressive training engage dopaminergic reward circuits and sustained motor cortex plasticity that may further upregulate neurotrophic signalling beyond what is observed with habituated, repetitive exercise [7,22].
BDNF’s role extends beyond neuronal survival. It modulates glucose metabolism, reduces neuroinflammatory signalling through TrkB receptor pathways, and suppresses amyloid-beta toxicity in preclinical models. In the metabolic disease context, where chronic low-grade inflammation and insulin resistance are upstream drivers of both neurodegenerative and vascular dementia, BDNF’s pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitising properties further reinforce the neuroprotective case for exercise-based BDNF induction [14,21].
Vestibular System Activation and Its Hippocampal Connections
The vestibular system, comprising the semicircular canals and otolith organs of the inner ear detects angular and linear acceleration, providing the nervous system with continuous information about head position and movement in space. While traditionally conceived in terms of balance and gaze stabilisation, a growing body of evidence has repositioned the vestibular system as a significant contributor to spatial cognition, episodic memory, and hippocampal function [23,24].
The vestibular-hippocampal axis is anatomically and functionally well-characterised. Vestibular nuclei project directly to the hippocampus via thalamic relay stations, and place cells, the hippocampal neurons underlying spatial navigation and the cognitive map receive vestibular input critical to updating position estimates during movement. Bilateral vestibular deafferentation in rodent models produces hippocampal atrophy and severe spatial memory deficits . Reciprocally, stimulation of the vestibular system through galvanic vestibular stimulation, spinning, or complex balance challenges has been shown to increase hippocampal theta oscillations and enhance spatial memory performance in both animals and humans [23,24].
The handstand places the vestibular system under a profoundly novel challenge. Inversion reverses the customary gravitational reference frame for the otolith organs, forces rapid recalibration of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, and demands continuous vestibular-proprioceptive integration to maintain balance. This constitutes a form of vestibular exercise that goes far beyond what is experienced in walking, cycling, or even conventional balance training on stable or unstable surfaces. The complexity and novelty of the vestibular stimulus, particularly during the learning phase may be critical to its cognitive benefit, as evidence suggests that novel rather than habituated sensorimotor challenges more powerfully activate hippocampal-prefrontal circuits [23,25].
In the context of dementia, the vestibular-cognitive connection is clinically underappreciated. Vestibular dysfunction is prevalent in older adults, affecting up to 35% of those over 40 and has been independently associated with cognitive decline, accelerated hippocampal volume loss, and increased dementia risk. Conversely, balance and vestibular rehabilitation programmes have shown promising effects on cognitive outcomes in older adults. Handstand practice, conceived as structured vestibular training, may therefore address a distinct and currently undertreated modifiable risk pathway [24].
Proprioception, Motor Cortex Engagement, and the Architecture of Cognitive Reserve
Proprioception, the body’s system for sensing the position, movement, and force of its own segments is mediated by muscle spindles, Golgi tendon organs, and joint mechanoreceptors whose afferent signals continuously update the primary somatosensory, parietal association, and motor cortices. The density and complexity of proprioceptive processing in any given exercise is determined by the number of joints involved, the dynamic nature of the task, and the degree of external stability available [15,26].
The handstand is proprioceptively exceptional. Maintaining an inverted balance requires real-time modulation of finger, wrist, elbow, shoulder, core, hip, and ankle position simultaneously, a proprioceptive richness that far exceeds conventional exercises. The hands, bearing the full body weight, transmit moment-to-moment mechanical feedback through the carpal joints and finger pads that must be continuously integrated with vestibular and visual signals to generate the micro-corrections that sustain balance. This demands extensive bilateral engagement of the primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum networks that overlap significantly with the prefrontal and parietal circuits implicated in working memory, attention, and executive function [22,26].
The concept of cognitive reserve, the brain’s functional resilience against pathological damage, built through years of cognitively stimulating experiences is central to dementia epidemiology. Higher cognitive reserve, associated with education, occupational complexity, and leisure activities, buffers against the clinical expression of Alzheimer’s pathology by maintaining functional neural networks even as amyloid and tau burdens increase. Physical activities that engage the brain in skill acquisition, spatial problem-solving, and coordinated attention contribute to cognitive reserve in ways that simple repetitive exercise does not. The handstand, as a complex motor skill requiring sustained learning, spatial orientation, and attentional engagement, may be particularly potent in building the kind of cognitive reserve that delays dementia onset [25,27].
Autonomic Nervous System Modulation and Neuroendocrine Neuroprotection
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) profoundly influences brain health through its regulation of cerebrovascular tone, neuroinflammatory signalling, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. Chronic sympathetic overactivation, as seen in psychological stress, metabolic syndrome, and sleep disorders drives neuroinflammation, impairs cerebrovascular autoregulation, and elevates cortisol, all of which are independently associated with accelerated neurodegenerative pathology [14,28].
Inversion exercises engage two complementary parasympathetic-activating mechanisms. First, baroreceptors in the carotid sinus and aortic arch sensitive to arterial pressure, detect the increased hydrostatic pressure at the head level during inversion and reflexively activate the vagus nerve, increasing parasympathetic tone and reducing heart rate and sympathetic outflow. This baroreflex-mediated vagal activation is analogous to the mechanism exploited by vagus nerve stimulation therapy in neurological conditions and is known to reduce systemic and neuroinflammatory markers. Second, the meditative quality of handstand practice the sustained, present-moment attentional focus required, activates prefrontal regulatory circuits that exert top-down inhibition of the amygdala and HPA axis, reducing cortisol secretion [16,28,29].
Chronically elevated cortisol is among the most well-established neurobiological mediators of dementia risk, directly promoting hippocampal neuronal atrophy, suppressing neurogenesis, and impairing synaptic plasticity through glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanisms. In populations with metabolic syndrome, where hypercortisolaemia is common. This pathway represents a potent and actionable target. Exercise’s capacity to normalise HPA axis reactivity and reduce resting cortisol is well-documented; the combination of physical effort and enforced attentional focus in the handstand may make it particularly effective in this regard [28,29].
Mindfulness in Motion: The Attentional Demands of the Handstand as Prefrontal Training
The cognitive demands of the handstand are as remarkable as its physical ones. Unlike walking, cycling, or running , activities that can be performed while listening to music, watching television, or engaging in conversation, the handstand demands an absolute, absorbed, present-moment attentional focus. Any mental wandering is immediately and consequentially punished by a fall. This enforced mindfulness constitutes an exercise of the prefrontal cortex, the seat of executive function, working memory, and top-down attentional control that is qualitatively different from passive mindfulness meditation and from routine exercise [29,30].
Research on yoga, tai chi, and dance, movement forms that share the handstand’s requirement for focused, embodied attention, consistently demonstrate superior cognitive benefits compared to equivalent-intensity aerobic exercise without attentional demand. A randomised controlled trial by Gothe and colleagues found that an 8-week Hatha yoga programme produced significant improvements in working memory capacity, cognitive flexibility, and mental speed relative to a stretching-toning control group, effects attributed to the combined mindfulness and movement architecture of yoga practice. The handstand, as a maximal expression of this integrated attentional-physical challenge, may represent the upper end of this cognitive-exercise dose-response curve [16,30].
Neuroimaging studies in practitioners of attention-demanding movement arts reveal structural and functional adaptations in prefrontal, insular, and anterior cingulate cortices, regions critical to cognitive control and among the last to be affected in early Alzheimer’s disease. Regular engagement of these networks through cognitively challenging movement may not only enhance current executive function but actively build the cortical reserve that delays the transition from preclinical to clinical dementia [30].
Synergistic Neuroprotection: Why Handstand May Exceed The Sum of Its Parts
The preceding sections have presented handstand’s neuroprotective mechanisms as conceptually distinct; in reality, they operate in continuous, mutually reinforcing interaction. Elevated cerebral blood flow during inversion enhances the delivery of BDNF and glucose to the hippocampus, a region already stimulated by the concurrent vestibular and proprioceptive inputs. Reduced cortisol from ANS modulation creates a neurochemical environment more permissive to BDNF-driven neurogenesis. Prefrontal engagement during balance maintenance reinforces the neural circuits most vulnerable in early dementia, while simultaneously building the cognitive reserve that buffers against pathological progression [7,22,27].
This mechanistic synergy is not merely additive, it may be multiplicative. The concept of multi-modal exercise, which engages both aerobic and resistance components in addition to balance and cognitive challenge, has emerged in the literature as consistently superior to single-modality interventions for cognitive outcomes in older adults. Meta-analyses comparing exercise types for dementia prevention place “multi-component exercise” at the top of the benefit hierarchy, above aerobic exercise alone, resistance training alone, or balance training alone. The handstand, uniquely, encompasses all four components simultaneously [4,5,25].
This positions the handstand as a candidate exercise that may be unusually cost-effective in terms of cognitive benefit per unit of time. A 20-minute handstand training session , encompassing progressions, holds, and targeted balance work, may engage neuroprotective mechanisms that would otherwise require separate aerobic, resistance, balance, and mindfulness interventions, each of which is typically recommended as a distinct 30-to-60-minute programme. For individuals with limited time or motivation for multi-modal exercise regimens, the handstand’s mechanistic density is a practical as much as a scientific asset.
Clinical Translation, Safety Considerations, and Practical Protocols
Despite its compelling mechanistic profile, the handstand cannot be introduced to clinical populations without careful consideration of safety and accessibility. Several medical conditions represent relative or absolute contraindications to inversion exercise. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >160 mmHg) and severe cardiovascular disease may make sudden haemodynamic shifts during inversion hazardous. Glaucoma and conditions associated with raised intraocular pressure are contraindicated, as inversion transiently increases intraocular pressure. Retinal detachment, recent ocular surgery, and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux are further contraindications. Cervical spine pathology, disc herniation, severe osteoarthritis, or instability precludes full-weight-bearing inversions. Any candidate for an inversion-based intervention programme should undergo appropriate pre-participation cardiovascular and musculoskeletal screening [17,18].
For individuals without contraindications, a staged progression protocol is recommended. Phase 1 (weeks 1–4) may involve partial inversions, downward-facing dog, pike position, and inverted rows which provide vestibular and haemodynamic stimulation at lower intensity and risk. Phase 2 (weeks 5–12) may introduce wall-assisted handstands, building both the physical capacity and vestibular tolerance required for freestanding practice. Phase 3 (months 4 onwards) may progress to freestanding handstand practice with appropriate supervision, with duration and complexity increased incrementally. Throughout all phases, the cognitive engagement components focused attention, proprioceptive awareness, and mindful breathing.
In the context of older adult populations, evidence from balance and yoga-based exercise research suggests that even partially inverted, balance-challenging exercises are safe and beneficial when properly supervised and progressed. Tai chi, a movement form sharing proprioceptive, vestibular, and attentional features with handstand progressions has demonstrated significant reductions in dementia risk and fall incidence in randomised trials, supporting the feasibility of complex movement practices in this age group. Integration of handstand progressions into structured exercise programmes at health promotion clinics, wellness centres, or within digital health platforms therefore represents a realistic near-term clinical translation pathway [16,25].
Limitations and Future Research Directions
The central limitation of this review is the absence of direct experimental evidence linking handstand practice to cognitive outcomes or dementia biomarkers. No randomised controlled trial, prospective cohort study, or mechanistic human experimental study has specifically examined the effects of handstand training on neuroimaging, neuropsychological, or dementia-related endpoints. The mechanistic argument presented here, while grounded in well-established neuroscience, remains inferential, a hypothesis built from converging lines of indirect evidence rather than direct empirical demonstration.
Several methodological and practical challenges will need to be addressed in future research. Handstand training is inherently difficult to standardise across participants; the dose of vestibular, haemodynamic, and proprioceptive stimulus varies substantially between a novice performing wall-assisted holds for 10 seconds and an advanced practitioner holding a 60-second freestanding handstand. Appropriate outcome measures must span multiple domains, cerebral blood flow velocity (transcranial Doppler), serum BDNF, hippocampal volume (MRI), cognitive performance (validated neuropsychological batteries), and where feasible, amyloid/tau biomarkers (PET or CSF). Blinding of participants and assessors presents practical challenges inherent to exercise interventions.
Priority research directions include: (1) a pilot mechanistic RCT comparing a 16-week handstand progression programme to aerobic exercise and a sedentary control group on cerebral blood flow, BDNF, and cognitive measures in adults aged 50–70; (2) neuroimaging studies examining acute haemodynamic and functional connectivity changes during inversion in healthy volunteers; (3) longitudinal observational studies in gymnastics and yoga populations with long-term inversion practice; and (4) investigation of optimal inversion duration, frequency, and progression for cognitive benefit in older and metabolically compromised populations. Collaboration across exercise science, neurology, and digital health technology platforms will be essential to accelerating this research agenda.
Conclusion
Dementia is not an inevitable consequence of ageing , it is, to a significant degree, a preventable disease whose trajectory can be altered by lifestyle choices made decades before symptoms emerge. The handstand, one of humanity’s oldest and most athletically demanding movement practices, presents a uniquely convergent neuroprotective profile that encompasses cerebrovascular enhancement, neurotrophic stimulation, vestibular-hippocampal activation, proprioceptive cortical engagement, autonomic modulation, and attentional prefrontal training. No conventional exercise modality simultaneously engages all of these mechanisms with the same mechanistic density.
This narrative review does not claim that handstands cure or prevent dementia; such a claim would be premature in the absence of direct clinical evidence. What it argues, on the basis of substantial and convergent mechanistic literature, is that the handstand is a scientifically compelling candidate for dementia prevention research that has been overlooked for reasons of convention rather than evidence. The absence of data is not the same as the absence of effect.
As practitioners and researchers at the intersection of longevity science, digital health technology, and metabolic medicine, we have both the mandate and the opportunity to investigate the brain health potential of movement practices beyond the conventional exercise canon. Standing on one’s hands , literally placing the brain at the centre of the workout may prove to be one of the most effective, accessible, and cost-free investments in long-term cognitive health available to the global population. The time to study it is now.
Reference
1. Nichols E, Steinmetz JD, Vollset SE, Fukutaki K, Chalek J, Abd-Allah F, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105–e125. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8
2. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413–446. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6
3. Patterson C. World Alzheimer Report 2018: The state of the art of dementia research: New frontiers. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2018.
4. Northey JM, Cherbuin N, Pumpa KL, Smee DJ, Rattray B. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):154–160. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096587
5. Bherer L, Erickson KI, Liu-Ambrose T. A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. J Aging Res. 2013;2013:657508. doi:10.1155/2013/657508
6. Cotman CW, Berchtold NC, Christie LA. Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(9):464–472. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.011
7. Hötting K, Röder B. Beneficial effects of physical exercise on neuroplasticity and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(9 Pt B):2243–2257. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.005
8. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535–562. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
9. Iadecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron. 2013;80(4):844–866. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008
10. Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, Basak C, Szabo A, Chaddock L, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(7):3017–3022. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015950108
11. Szuhany KL, Bugatti M, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;60:56–64. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.003
12. Seifert T, Brassard P, Wissenberg M, Rasmussen P, Nordby P, Stallknecht B, et al. Endurance training enhances BDNF release from the human brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298(2):R372–R377. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00734.2009
13. Whitmer RA, Gustafson DR, Barrett-Connor E, Haan MN, Gunderson EP, Yaffe K. Central obesity and increased risk of dementia more than three decades later. Neurology. 2008;71(14):1057–1064. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000320046.35106.a6
14. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine — evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl 3):1–72. doi:10.1111/sms.12581
15. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(4):1651–1697. doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011
16. Gothe NP, Khan I, Hayes J, Erlenbach E, Damoiseaux JS. Yoga effects on brain health: a systematic review of the current literature. Brain Plast. 2019;5(1):105–122. doi:10.3233/BPL-190084
17. Ogoh S, Ainslie PN. Cerebral blood flow during exercise: mechanisms of regulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009;107(5):1370–1380. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00573.2009
18. Davenport MH, Hogan DB, Eskes GA, Longman RS, Poulin MJ. Cerebrovascular reserve: the link between fitness and cognitive function? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012;40(3):153–158. doi:10.1097/JES.0b013e3182553430
19. Thomas BP, Yezhuvath US, Tseng BY, Liu P, Levine BD, Zhang R, et al. Life-long aerobic exercise preserved baseline cerebral blood flow but reduced vascular reactivity to CO2. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(5):1177–1183. doi:10.1002/jmri.24066
20. Lista I, Sorrentino G. Biological mechanisms of physical activity in preventing cognitive decline. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010;30(4):493–503. doi:10.1007/s10571-009-9488-x
21. Duman RS, Voleti B. Signaling pathways underlying the pathophysiology and treatment of depression: novel mechanisms for rapid-acting agents. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(1):47–56. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.004
22. Colcombe S, Kramer AF. Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(2):125–130. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430
23. Smith PF, Zheng Y. From ear to uncertainty: vestibular contributions to cognitive function. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013;7:84. doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00084
24. Bigelow RT, Agrawal Y. Vestibular involvement in cognition: visuospatial ability, attention, executive function, and memory. J Vestib Res. 2015;25(2):73–89. doi:10.3233/VES-150541
25. Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, Hall CB, Derby CA, Kuslansky G, et al. Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2508–2516. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022252
26. Liu-Ambrose T, Nagamatsu LS, Voss MW, Khan KM, Handy TC. Resistance training and functional plasticity of the aging brain: a twelve-month randomized controlled trial. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(8):1690–1698. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.021
27. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(11):1006–1012. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6
28. Lucassen PJ, Pruessner J, Sousa N, Almeida OF, Van Dam AM, Rajkowska G, et al. Neuropathology of stress. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(1):109–135. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1223-5
29. Lazar SW, Kerr CE, Wasserman RH, Gray JR, Greve DN, Treadway MT, et al. Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport. 2005;16(17):1893–1897. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19
30. Kramer AF, Erickson KI. Capitalizing on cortical plasticity: influence of physical activity on cognition and brain function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(8):342–348. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.009