Keywords: Calisthenics, Bodyweight Exercise, Sarcopenia, Health Span, Myokines, Telomere Length
Introduction
The global population aged 60 years and older is projected to double by 2050, reaching 2.1 billion individuals, representing a public health challenge of unprecedented scale. Aging is characterized not merely by the passage of time, but by the progressive deterioration of physiological systems that govern strength, metabolic homeostasis, cognitive resilience, and immune competence. The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified physical inactivity as a primary driver of non-communicable disease burden and premature mortality, ranking it among the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years worldwide [1,2].
Despite decades of evidence attesting to the benefits of exercise, more than a quarter of the global adult population remains insufficiently active. This epidemiological reality has amplified research interest in identifying accessible, low-cost, and effective exercise modalities capable of reaching diverse population, including older adults in low- and middle-income settings. Calisthenics, defined broadly as structured bodyweight resistance exercise, has re-emerged as a scientifically relevant and practically compelling modality for healthy aging. Unlike gym-dependent resistance training, calisthenics requires no specialised equipment, can be performed in virtually any environment, and can be progressively loaded through leverage, range of motion, and tempo manipulation [1,3].
The concept of “health span”, the period of life spent in good health, free from chronic disease or disability has become a central objective in longevity medicine, distinct from mere lifespan extension. Physical exercise remains the single most broadly efficacious non-pharmacological intervention known to extend health span. Among exercise modalities, resistance training and aerobic exercise have historically received the greatest research attention. However, calisthenics occupies a unique space at the intersection of both categories: its performance demands muscular force production against bodyweight loads while simultaneously requiring cardiovascular engagement and joint mobility [3,4].
This narrative review synthesizes the existing body of evidence examining the mechanistic and clinical effects of calisthenics on the key biological determinants of healthy aging. We examine the molecular pathways linking bodyweight resistance exercise to longevity, evaluate musculoskeletal, cardiometabolic, and neurocognitive outcomes, compare the efficacy of calisthenics against conventional resistance training, and propose evidence-based recommendations for its clinical application in longevity and preventive health programs [4,5].
The Biology of Aging: Sarcopenia, Inflammaging, and Cellular Senescence
Aging is a multifactorial biological process driven by progressive dysregulation across molecular, cellular, and organ system levels. López-Otín and colleagues identified nine hallmarks of aging which are genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication. providing a conceptual framework for understanding age-associated decline and disease [6].
Among the most clinically consequential manifestations of aging is sarcopenia, the progressive, generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. The revised European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) defines sarcopenia by low muscle strength as the primary parameter, with confirmed sarcopenia requiring evidence of low muscle quantity or quality, and severe sarcopenia identified by the addition of poor physical performance. Sarcopenia affects an estimated 10–20% of adults over 60 years and up to 30% of those over 80 years. Its consequences extend beyond mobility impairment, encompassing metabolic dysregulation, increased fracture risk, immune senescence, and excess all-cause mortality [7,8].
Parallel to sarcopenia, the aging organism is characterized by a state of chronic, low-grade systemic inflammation, a phenomenon termed “inflammaging.” Elevated circulating concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP), are consistently observed in older adults and represent independent predictors of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cognitive decline, and frailty. Adipose tissue, senescent cells, and a dysregulated innate immune system are the primary sources of this inflammatory milieu [6,9].
At the cellular level, telomere attrition, the progressive shortening of protective DNA structures at chromosome termini with each cell division is a critical biomarker of biological aging. Short telomeres are associated with cellular senescence, impaired regenerative capacity, and an increased burden of age-related chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and several malignancies. Physical exercise, particularly resistance training, has been demonstrated to attenuate telomere shortening and upregulate telomerase activity, suggesting that exercise fundamentally modulates the pace of cellular aging [10,11].
Mitochondrial dysfunction is another central mechanism through which aging is propagated. With age, mitochondria accumulate oxidative damage, exhibit reduced biogenesis, and produce excess reactive oxygen species (ROS). Skeletal muscle, the most metabolically active tissue in the body is particularly vulnerable to mitochondrial decline, and loss of mitochondrial quality is directly implicated in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia, insulin resistance, and impaired exercise capacity. Exercise training has been consistently shown to reverse several markers of mitochondrial aging through mechanisms including upregulation of PGC-1α, the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis [6,12].
Calisthenics: Definition, Principles, and Historical Context
The term calisthenics derives from the Greek words “kalos” (beauty) and “sthenos” (strength), encapsulating its historical dual purpose of cultivating both physical aesthetics and functional capacity. In modern exercise science, calisthenics is defined as structured resistance exercise performed using bodyweight as the primary external load, including movements such as push-ups, pull-ups, dips, squats, lunges, planks, and their numerous progressions and variations [5,13].
A defining characteristic of calisthenics is its inherent scalability. Progressive overload, the fundamental principle underpinning all resistance training adaptations can be achieved without additional external loading by manipulating leverage (e.g., elevating feet during push-ups), range of motion, tempo, unilateral versus bilateral loading (e.g., pistol squats versus bilateral squats), and stability demand. Advanced calisthenics skills such as the planche, front lever, human flag, and one-arm pull-up require extraordinary levels of strength and body control, demonstrating that bodyweight exercise can challenge even highly trained athletes [13,14].
From a biomechanical perspective, calisthenics exercises frequently involve multi-joint, compound movement patterns that recruit large muscle groups simultaneously and demand substantial neuromuscular coordination. This characteristic not only enhances functional strength relevant to activities of daily living but also imposes greater stabiliser muscle activation compared to machine-based resistance exercise. The proprioceptive demands of calisthenics may be particularly advantageous for older adults, in whom deficits in neuromuscular coordination, balance, and proprioception are primary contributors to fall risk and functional decline [14,15].
Molecular and Physiological Mechanisms Linking Calisthenics to Longevity
Hormonal Responses: Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1
Resistance exercise is a potent stimulus for the acute secretion of anabolic hormones, including growth hormone (GH) and its downstream mediator, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). GH secretion is enhanced by high training volume, short inter-set rest periods, and compound movement patterns, characteristics common to calisthenics programming. IGF-1 exerts anabolic and anti-atrophic effects on skeletal muscle through activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, directly counteracting the protein synthetic deficits that characterize sarcopenic muscle. A systematic review and meta-analysis reported that resistance training is associated with significantly elevated serum IGF-1 in participants over 60 years, with the effect being most pronounced in those training for under 16 weeks, suggesting a particularly important adaptive stimulus in deconditioned older individuals [16,17].
The decline in GH and IGF-1 secretion observed with aging, collectively termed “somatopause”, contributes directly to losses in lean mass, bone mineral density, and metabolic rate. Regular physical exercise increase of GH and IGF-1 activity in elderly individuals has been demonstrated to improve the aging process and quality of life. By maintaining the anabolic hormonal environment through regular calisthenics training, older adults can partially offset the endocrine deterioration that accelerates sarcopenia and functional decline [17,18].
Myokines: Skeletal Muscle as an Endocrine Organ
A paradigm shift in exercise physiology has emerged from the recognition that contracting skeletal muscle functions as an endocrine organ, secreting a diverse array of signaling proteins termed myokines. These include irisin, myostatin, interleukin-6 (exercise-induced), follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1), SPARC, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), among others. Myokines exert paracrine, autocrine, and endocrine effects on diverse organ systems, establishing a biochemical communication network between exercising muscle and the brain, adipose tissue, bone, liver, pancreas, and immune system [19,20].
Irisin, cleaved from the membrane protein FNDC5 during resistance and endurance exercise, plays a pivotal role in browning of white adipose tissue, improving insulin sensitivity, enhancing bone mineral density, and, critically, crossing the blood-brain barrier to upregulate BDNF expression in the hippocampus. Myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle hypertrophy, is suppressed by resistance exercise, thereby facilitating net muscle protein accretion. The age-related increase in myostatin signaling is considered a significant contributor to sarcopenia, and the suppressive effect of calisthenics on myostatin activity represents a direct mechanistic counter to muscle wasting in older adults [20,21].
Telomere Preservation and Biological Aging
As previously described, telomere attrition is a cardinal hallmark of biological aging. A landmark study by Tucker and Bates, examining 4,814 US adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), demonstrated that adults who engaged in regular strength training had significantly longer telomeres than non-exercisers, even after adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, aerobic activity, and smoking status. The estimated biological age advantage associated with regular resistance training was approximately 1.5–1.8 years [10].
The mechanisms underlying exercise-mediated telomere preservation are multifactorial. Resistance exercise reduces oxidative stress, a primary driver of telomere degradation through upregulation of endogenous antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. Additionally, exercise attenuates inflammaging by reducing circulating levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP, all of which exert telomere-shortening effects through oxidative and inflammatory pathways. Werner and colleagues demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial that endurance and interval training increased telomerase activity, while resistance training showed distinct patterns, underscoring the complementary anti-aging benefits of different exercise modalities [10,11].
Anti-Inflammatory Effects and the suppression of Inflammaging
Calisthenics-induced muscular contractions initiate a cascade of anti-inflammatory adaptations at multiple levels. Acutely, exercise transiently elevates IL-6 from muscle fibres, paradoxically acting in an anti-inflammatory capacity by stimulating IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) production. With chronic training, systemic CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 (from non-muscular sources) decline significantly. A 2024 systematic review published in the American Journal of Physiology demonstrated that exercise training reduces levels of multiple cardiovascular and inflammatory markers including PAI-1, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin, CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α, while anti-inflammatory markers IL-4 and IL-10 are upregulated [9,22].
This shift in the inflammatory balance is particularly relevant in the context of metabolic disease prevention. Chronic low-grade inflammation is a central pathophysiological feature of the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and cardiovascular disease, conditions whose prevalence rises dramatically with age. By suppressing the inflammatory phenotype, regular calisthenics training may delay or prevent the transition from subclinical metabolic dysfunction to overt disease [22,23].
Calisthenics and Musculoskeletal Health in Aging
Sarcopenia Prevention and Reversal
The preservation of skeletal muscle mass and strength is arguably the most critical physiological objective in healthy aging. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy of exercise on muscle function in older adults with sarcopenia demonstrated that structured resistance exercise programs significantly improve grip strength, knee extension strength, lower extremity muscle mass, walking speed, and functional mobility. These effects were consistent across programs varying in frequency, duration, and mode of resistance application [8,24].
Calisthenics, when implemented with progressive overload principles, has been shown to produce muscle hypertrophy and strength gains comparable to those achieved with free-weight and machine-based resistance training. A 2026 randomized controlled trial by Li and colleagues examined the effects of a 12-week calisthenics exercise program on physical fitness in adults with obesity and demonstrated significant improvements in muscular endurance, balance, and functional capacity. The biomechanical nature of compound calisthenics movements, requiring simultaneous engagement of agonist, antagonist, and stabilizer muscle groups, may confer additional functional strength benefits over isolated machine-based exercises [13,25].
Protein synthesis stimulation following resistance exercise is mediated through the mTORC1 pathway, and this response is preserved in older adults when training intensity is sufficient. McLeod and colleagues emphasized that skeletal muscle strength, not mass alone is the most robust predictor of health outcomes in aging, and that maintaining muscular strength through consistent resistance exercise fundamentally alters the trajectory of physical decline. Calisthenics, with its inherent focus on functional compound movements, is well-positioned to generate the neuromuscular adaptations necessary to maintain strength and functional independence through late life [26].
Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis, characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and deteriorated bone microarchitecture, affects an estimated 200 million people worldwide and is a leading cause of fracture, disability, and mortality in older adults. Bone remodeling is acutely sensitive to mechanical loading, specifically, the strain generated by muscular contractions and ground reaction forces during weight-bearing and resistance exercise. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated that multicomponent exercise programs combining resistance and impact-loading activities significantly improve BMD at clinically relevant skeletal sites including the lumbar spine and femoral neck [15,27].
Calisthenics movements inherently involve weight-bearing and require substantial muscular force transmission through the skeleton. Movements such as squats, lunges, jump squats, and plyometric push-ups generate significant skeletal loading forces. Research from MDedge and supporting clinical trials has indicated that calisthenics may reverse age-related bone loss in middle-aged men, particularly at weight-bearing skeletal sites. This suggests that appropriately dosed calisthenics programs, particularly those incorporating impact and plyometric elements, represent a viable strategy for maintaining or improving BMD in aging populations [15,27].
Fall Prevention, Balance, and functional Independence
Falls are among the most devastating consequences of age-related physical decline, representing a leading cause of injury-related mortality and hospitalization in adults over 65 years. The multifactorial etiology of falls encompasses muscle weakness, impaired proprioception, reduced postural stability, attentional deficits, and visual decline. Exercise interventions targeting these determinants are among the most evidence-based strategies for fall prevention [28].
A Cochrane systematic review by Sherrington and colleagues demonstrated that balance and functional exercises reduce fall rates by approximately 24% in community-dwelling older adults, with programs combining balance, strength, and functional training achieving the greatest risk reduction. Calisthenics exercises, including single-leg squats, lunges, step-ups, dynamic balancing progressions, and core stability work, systematically challenge these exact neuromuscular capacities. The proprioceptive demands inherent in calisthenics training, particularly unilateral and unstable progressions, may provide superior benefits for fall prevention compared to bilateral, machine-based resistance exercise [15,28].
Calisthenics and Cardiometabolic Health
Insulin Sensitivity and Metabolic Syndrome
The global epidemic of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome reflects a confluence of physical inactivity, excess adiposity, and chronic inflammation, all of which are directly addressable through exercise. Resistance training improves insulin sensitivity through multiple complementary mechanisms: expansion of skeletal muscle mass (the primary site of postprandial glucose disposal), upregulation of GLUT-4 transporter expression, improvement of mitochondrial oxidative capacity, and reduction of intramyocellular and visceral lipid accumulation [23,29].
A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Scientific Reports examined the effects of combined exercise training, integrating resistance and cardiovascular components, as is characteristic of structured calisthenics on glucose metabolism and inflammatory markers in sedentary adults. Combined training programs demonstrated superior improvements in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and insulin resistance indices compared to either modality alone, with the anti-inflammatory co-benefits reinforcing metabolic improvements. For individuals with or at risk of type 2 diabetes, calisthenics provides a particularly accessible intervention that simultaneously addresses insulin resistance, inflammation, and the physical deconditioning that amplifies metabolic risk [22,29].
Cardiovascular Adaptations
Although cardiovascular adaptations are primarily associated with endurance training, resistance exercise, including calisthenics produces clinically meaningful improvements in several cardiovascular risk factors. Regular resistance training reduces resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure, improves arterial stiffness and endothelial function, favorably modifies lipid profiles by raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and reducing triglycerides, and attenuates the age-related decline in cardiorespiratory fitness [30,31].
A comparative study by Schroeder and colleagues demonstrated that combined resistance and aerobic training produced more comprehensive improvements in cardiovascular disease risk factors than either modality in isolation, a profile closely mirrored by circuit-format calisthenics that integrates resistance and aerobic demands within a single session. Cardiorespiratory fitness, measured as VO2max is one of the strongest independent predictors of all-cause mortality in older adults; a study by Sui and colleagues demonstrated that even modest improvements in fitness are associated with substantially reduced mortality risk, regardless of age, sex, or body mass index [31,32].
Calisthenics, Cognitive Function, and Mental Health
The relationship between physical exercise and cognitive health is among the most rapidly growing areas in neuroscience. Regular exercise has been demonstrated to attenuate age-related cognitive decline, reduce the risk of dementia, improve executive function, memory, and processing speed, and exert anxiolytic and antidepressant effects equivalent to pharmacological interventions in mild-to-moderate depression [33,34].
The primary neurobiological mechanism linking exercise to cognitive health is the upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neurotrophin that promotes neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and neuronal survival. BDNF is particularly critical for hippocampal neurogenesis, with reductions in BDNF signaling strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative conditions. Both aerobic and resistance exercise acutely and chronically elevate peripheral BDNF levels, with hippocampal BDNF upregulation demonstrated in animal models of exercise [33,34].
Irisin, produced by contracting muscle during resistance exercise including calisthenics, crosses the blood-brain barrier and stimulates BDNF expression in the hippocampus. A comprehensive review by Severinsen and Pedersen identified irisin as a key mediator of the muscle-brain axis, linking skeletal muscle contraction to cognitive neuroprotection. This “myokine-BDNF axis” provides a mechanistic explanation for the observation that individuals with greater muscle mass and strength demonstrate lower rates of cognitive decline and dementia in longitudinal studies [19,20].
Circuit-format calisthenics, which involves brief rest periods and rhythmic, coordinated movement patterns, may additionally provide benefits to attentional networks, dual-task performance, and cognitive flexibility through mechanisms related to increased cerebral perfusion, autonomic nervous system modulation, and reduced cortisol-mediated hippocampal atrophy. The compound coordination demands of advanced calisthenics skills may represent a form of motor learning with neuroprotective properties analogous to the cognitively stimulating effects of learning musical instruments or second languages [34,35].
Calisthenics Versus Conventional Resistance Training: A Comparative Analysis
A central question in exercise prescription is whether calisthenics can produce musculoskeletal and metabolic adaptations equivalent to conventional free-weight or machine-based resistance training. The prevailing evidence suggests that when key training variables, primarily volume (sets × repetitions), intensity (proximity to muscular failure), and progressive overload are matched, the modality of resistance application is of secondary importance to overall training outcomes [24,25].
A 2022 systematic review confirmed that training close to muscular failure is the critical variable driving hypertrophy and strength gains, irrespective of load magnitude. This principle has profound implications for calisthenics, as it validates the capacity of bodyweight training to produce hypertrophic and strength adaptations when exercises are performed with sufficient effort and progressive challenge. A frequently cited study demonstrated that push-up training performed at equivalent loads to bench press produced comparable gains in muscle thickness and upper body strength, reinforcing the equivalence hypothesis [25].
Functional advantages of calisthenics over machine-based training include superior stabilizer muscle activation, enhanced proprioceptive neuromuscular training, greater range-of-motion challenge, and the absence of equipment dependency, allowing consistent training regardless of facility access. For older adults in particular, the movement patterns inherent in calisthenics such as standing, squatting, pushing, pulling more closely mirror the functional demands of activities of daily living than do movements performed in fixed-axis resistance machines [14,24].
Practical Recommendations for Calisthenics in Healthy Aging
Based on the current evidence, the following framework is proposed for the application of calisthenics in longevity and preventive health programs. The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) recommend that older adults engage in resistance training targeting all major muscle groups at least two days per week, at moderate-to-vigorous intensity (60–80% of one-repetition maximum equivalent) [36].
For beginners and deconditioned older adults, entry-level calisthenics should emphasize movement pattern re-education, balance, and proprioception. Appropriate introductory exercises include wall push-ups, chair squats, step-ups, supported single-leg balance, and standing core stabilization. Progressive intensity should be achieved by advancing to standard push-ups, bodyweight squats, lunges, and plank variations. Individuals with the capacity to train at higher intensities may progress to explosive variants (jump squats, plyometric push-ups) and unilateral exercises (single-leg squats, pike push-ups) that generate greater mechanical loading and metabolic demand [14,36].
For cardiovascular and metabolic benefit, circuit-format calisthenics, in which exercises are performed sequentially with minimal rest, is recommended at least three sessions per week, with sessions of 30–60 minutes duration. This format simultaneously meets resistance training and moderate aerobic exercise guidelines, offering efficiency advantages for older adults with time or mobility constraints. Rest intervals of 30–90 seconds between exercises maintain an elevated heart rate conducive to cardiorespiratory adaptation, while allowing sufficient recovery for maintenance of exercise technique [31,36].
Nutritional considerations are inseparable from the efficacy of any exercise program for healthy aging. Adequate dietary protein, a minimum of 1.2–1.6 g/kg/day is required to support exercise-induced muscle protein synthesis and should be distributed evenly across meals. Vitamin D and calcium sufficiency are essential for bone density adaptation, and omega-3 fatty acids may potentiate the anti-inflammatory effects of exercise. Integration of calisthenics with appropriate nutritional support within a comprehensive longevity medicine framework maximizes the biological return on training investment [7,8].
Limitations and Future Research Directions
Several limitations constrain the current evidence base for calisthenics as a longevity intervention. First, the majority of existing randomized controlled trials examining bodyweight exercise in older adults employ short intervention durations (typically 8–16 weeks), which are insufficient to capture the full magnitude of long-term structural and molecular adaptations relevant to aging. Trials with follow-up periods of one year or more are needed to assess the durability of benefits and mortality-relevant outcomes [5,13].
Second, heterogeneity in the definition and operationalization of “calisthenics” across studies limits direct comparisons. Programs labelled as calisthenics vary widely in exercise selection, volume, intensity, and progression strategy. Standardized operational definitions and training protocols are needed to improve the comparability of findings across studies [13].
Third, most existing studies have enrolled relatively homogeneous populations, typically white, moderately healthy, community-dwelling older adults. Evidence in diverse ethnic, socioeconomic, and clinical populations, including those with multiple chronic conditions, frailty, or low baseline fitness is limited. Future research should prioritize these underserved populations, in whom the potential benefits of accessible, equipment-free exercise are greatest [8,24].
Finally, the interaction between calisthenics training and longevity-relevant biomarkers, including epigenetic clocks, telomere length, mitochondrial health markers, and advanced glycation end-product, merits dedicated investigation in well-powered longitudinal studies. The emerging field of exercise genomics may reveal individual differences in calisthenics responsiveness based on genetic and epigenetic profiles, enabling precision exercise prescription for healthy aging [6,10].
Conclusion
Calisthenics represents a scientifically validated, practically accessible, and cost-effective strategy for promoting healthy aging across the spectrum of biological, functional, and cognitive outcomes. Its mechanisms of action span the full breadth of the aging biology literature, attenuating hallmarks of cellular aging including telomere shortening, inflammaging, mitochondrial dysfunction, and sarcopenia while generating favorable adaptations in cardiometabolic, musculoskeletal, and neurocognitive domains [3,6,19].
The equivalence of calisthenics to conventional resistance training when training intensity and volume are matched, combined with its inherent advantages in accessibility, functional movement quality, and proprioceptive challenge, positions it as an ideal exercise modality for older adults seeking to preserve health span. Its integration into clinical longevity medicine, preventive health programs, community wellness initiatives, and digital health platforms represents a significant opportunity to address the global burden of age-related functional decline at scale [24,25].
Healthcare professionals, longevity practitioners, and exercise scientists are encouraged to incorporate calisthenics into their exercise prescriptions, particularly for older adults and populations with limited access to gym facilities. The prescription should adhere to principles of progressive overload, movement quality, adequate frequency, and integration with nutritional support. Future well-powered randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up, validated biomarker endpoints, and diverse populations are urgently needed to further characterize the longevity-promoting potential of calisthenics and to guide precision exercise prescription for healthy aging [8,36].
Reference
1. World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
2. Bautmans I, Knoop V, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan J, Maier AB, Beard JR, Freiberger E, et al. WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022;3(11):e789–96.
3. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–217.
4. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801–9.
5. Calatayud J, Borreani S, Colado JC, Martin F, Rogers ME. Muscle activation during push-ups with different suspension training systems. J Hum Kinet. 2014;43:225–34.
6. Rebelo-Marques A, De Sousa Lages A, Andrade R, Ramos CF, Llavero F, Zubeldia JM, et al. Aging hallmarks: the benefits of physical exercise. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:258.
7. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.
8. Chen N, He X, Feng Y, Ainsworth BE, Liu Y. Effects of resistance training in healthy older people with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2021;18(1):23.
9. Beavers KM, Brinkley TE, Nicklas BJ. Effect of exercise training on chronic inflammation. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411(11–12):785–93.
10. Tucker LA, Bates CJ. Telomere length and biological aging: the role of strength training in 4814 US men and women. Biology. 2024;13(11):883.
11. Werner CM, Hecksteden A, Morsch A, Zundler J, Wegmann M, Kratzsch J, et al. Differential effects of endurance, interval, and resistance training on telomerase activity and telomere length in a randomized, controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(1):34–46.
12. Leeuwenburgh C, Heinecke JW. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in exercise. Curr Med Chem. 2001;8(7):829–38.
13. Calatayud J, Vinstrup J, Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Brandt M, Jay K, et al. Importance of mind-muscle connection during progressive resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(3):527–33.
14. Fragala MS, Cadore EL, Dorgo S, Izquierdo M, Kraemer WJ, Peterson MD, et al. Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(8):2019–52.
15. Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, Howard K, et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD012424.
16. Biddle SJH, Batterham AM. High-intensity interval exercise training for public health: a decision framework for disadvantaged populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:95.
17. Prokopidis K, Dionyssiotis Y, Vardas M, Laskou F, Papandreou N, Patel D, et al. Exercise interventions and serum IGF-1 levels in older adults with frailty and/or sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1660694.
18. Nass R, Thorner MO. Impact of the GH-cortisol ratio on the age-dependent changes in body composition. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2002;12(3):147–61.
19. Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(8):457–65.
20. Severinsen MCK, Pedersen BK. Muscle-organ crosstalk: the emerging roles of myokines. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(4):594–609.
21. Barbalho SM, Flato UAP, Tofano RJ, Goulart RA, Guiguer EL, Detregiachi CRP, et al. Physical exercise and myokines: relationships with sarcopenia and cardiovascular complications. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(10):3607.
22. Washburn RA, Szabo AN, Lambourne K, Willis EA, Ptomey LT, Honas JJ, et al. Does the method of weight loss effect long-term changes in weight, body composition or chronic disease risk factors in overweight or obese adults? Syst Rev Meta-Anal. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e109849.
23. Schroeder EC, Franke WD, Sharp RL, Lee DC. Comparative effectiveness of aerobic, resistance, and combined training on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0210292.
24. Vlietstra L, Hendrickx W, Waters DL. Exercise interventions in healthy older adults with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Australas J Ageing. 2018;37(3):169–83.
25. Calatayud J, Borreani S, Colado JC, Flández J, Page P, Andersen LL. Exercise variation is important for maximizing upper-body strength: does the push-up or bench press produce the greater gains? Strength Cond J. 2015;37(6):61–4.
26. McLeod M, Breen L, Hamilton DL, Philp A. Live strong and prosper: the importance of skeletal muscle strength for healthy ageing. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):497–510.
27. Marques EA, Mota J, Carvalho J. Exercise effects on bone mineral density in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Age (Dordr). 2012;34(6):1493–515.
28. de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y, Vellas B, Maltais M. Association of long-term exercise training with risk of falls, fractures, hospitalizations, and mortality in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):394–405.
29. Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, Johannsen N, Johnson W, Kramer K, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(20):2253–62.
30. Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Laditka JN, Hardin JW, Chase N, Hooker SP, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity as mortality predictors in older adults. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2507–16.
31. Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, Yang YC, Cheng TY, Lee MC, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1244–53.
32. Lazarus NR, Harridge SDR. Declining performance of master athletes: silhouettes of the trajectory of healthy human aging? J Physiol. 2017;595(9):2941–8.
33. Cotman CW, Berchtold NC, Christie LA. Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(9):464–72.
34. Hötting K, Röder B. Beneficial effects of physical exercise on neuroplasticity and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(9 Pt B):2243–57.
35. Valenzuela PL, Castillo-García A, Morales JS, Izquierdo M, Serra-Rexach JA, Santos-Lozano A, et al. Exercise benefits on Alzheimer’s disease: state of the science. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;62:101108.
36. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.