A1C Almanac

Main Page

Salt, Sugar, and the Korean Longevity Paradox

Posted

by

dr Leonard Andreas Wiyadharma, BMedSci

Table of Contents
Category:

Introduction

South Korea provides an illustrative case for examining the relationship between sodium intake, broader dietary patterns, and longevity in an industrialized context. Nationally representative data indicate that Korean adults have historically exhibited among the highest sodium intakes in the world, with mean intakes around 4,800–5,300 mg/day in the early 2010s, although this has declined in response to policy efforts to approximately the mid‑3,000 mg/day range in more recent years, still well above international recommendations. [1,2] The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that adults consume less than 2,000 mg of sodium per day (equivalent to under 5 g of salt) [3], underscoring that average Korean intakes remain substantially elevated relative to this target. Despite this, South Korea has achieved very high life expectancy at birth, with recent OECD data indicating a national average of approximately 83.5 years, around 2–3 years higher than the OECD mean for comparable high‑income countries. [4] Probabilistic projections using Bayesian hierarchical models have further suggested that South Korea, particularly South Korean women, is likely to reach or exceed the highest life expectancy globally by 2030, surpassing 90 years in some scenarios. [5]

At face value, the coexistence of elevated sodium intake and exceptional life expectancy appears to contradict conventional sodium-centric models of cardiovascular risk. However, emerging literature suggests that this apparent paradox may reflect a broader misallocation of etiological emphasis in cardiometabolic risk assessment. DiNicolantonio and colleagues, for example, argue that added sugars, particularly fructose, may play a more central role than sodium in the development of hypertension and cardiometabolic disease, characterizing sugar rather than salt as the more critical “white crystal” driving these conditions. [6] Mechanistic and experimental work supports this contention: fructose has been identified as a key factor in the development of metabolic syndrome and hypertension through pathways involving insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia, enhanced renal sodium reabsorption, sympathetic activation, and uric‑acid–mediated endothelial dysfunction. [7,8] In parallel, the Institute of Medicine (IOM)’s comprehensive review of sodium intake concluded that evidence for benefit from very low sodium intakes (below approximately 2,300 mg/day) in the general population is limited and inconsistent, and that the relationship between sodium intake and clinical outcomes is likely non‑linear and context dependent. [9] Taken together, these findings suggest that the Korean case is less a true paradox and more an indication that the health impact of sodium must be interpreted within the broader dietary and metabolic milieu, including low added sugar intake, high potassium and fibre consumption, and other lifestyle and healthcare factors, and that the relative contributions of sodium and added sugars to cardiometabolic disease risk have likely been systematically misestimated in traditional public health narratives. [6,7,9]

The Underappreciated Role of Fructose in Hypertension

To comprehend why Koreans exhibit longevity despite elevated sodium consumption, it is necessary to first examine recent evidence regarding the metabolic effects of added sugars. DiNicolantonio and colleagues have argued that “we should not blame salt for what the sugar did,” proposing that fructose and added sugars demonstrate stronger associations with hypertension and cardiovascular disease than sodium chloride. [6,10] This perspective, articulated in peer-reviewed literature including the journal Open Heart, challenges several decades of sodium-centric dietary guidance [6] and provides a plausible mechanistic framework for understanding the Korean epidemiological data.

Mechanisms of Sugar-Induced Hypertension

Fructose metabolism exerts hypertensive effects through multiple distinct pathophysiological pathways that operate independently of sodium intake:

Insulin-Mediated Renal Sodium Retention. Consumption of refined carbohydrates and added sugars stimulates insulin secretion, and chronic hyperinsulinemia signals renal tubules to increase sodium reabsorption. This mechanism establishes a positive feedback loop wherein elevated sugar intake drives hyperinsulinemia, which subsequently promotes sodium retention, fluid volume expansion, and blood pressure elevation. Critically, the sodium retention represents a secondary consequence of insulin dysregulation rather than a primary effect of dietary sodium per se. [11-13]

Direct Vascular Effects of Fructose. Unlike glucose metabolism, fructose processing produces distinctive cardiovascular perturbations including increased cardiac contractility and myocardial oxygen demand, elevated peripheral vascular resistance through arterial vasoconstriction, sympathetic nervous system activation, and enhanced blood pressure variability. A 2024 systematic review confirmed that acute fructose administration significantly increases arterial pressure in human subjects through mechanisms independent of sodium intake. [8,12,14]

Metabolic Dysfunction Cascade. Fructose bypasses phosphofructokinase, the rate-limiting enzyme in glycolysis, thereby enabling unrestricted entry into hepatic metabolic pathways. This metabolic peculiarity facilitates conversion of fructose directly to hepatic lipid stores, culminating in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, peripheral insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, chronic low-grade inflammation, and hyperuricemia. All of these represent established risk factors for hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Controlled feeding studies demonstrate that fructose consumption for periods as brief as two weeks can significantly elevate markers of metabolic syndrome. [7,15]

Renal Injury Hypothesis. Recent investigations propose that fructose may induce primary hypertension through a biphasic mechanism involving initial renal vasoconstriction and ischemia, followed by immune cell infiltration and localized autoimmune-mediated chronic vasoconstriction. Notably, elevated dietary sodium amplifies this pathological cascade by increasing plasma osmolality, which in turn stimulates endogenous fructose synthesis. This synergistic interaction between sodium and sugar in processed foods may explain why combined exposure produces effects exceeding those observed with either nutrient in isolation. [12,16,17]

Epidemiological data are broadly consistent with these mechanistic insights. In a large US cohort, adults who obtained 25% or more of their total energy intake from added sugars had an almost threefold higher risk of CVD mortality compared with those consuming less than 10% of energy from added sugars (fully adjusted hazard ratio 2.75). [18] By contrast, evidence regarding population‑wide sodium restriction is more limited and heterogeneous. The 2013 IOM review of sodium intake and health outcomes concluded that for the general population there is insufficient and inconsistent evidence that lowering sodium intake below 2,300 mg/day either increases or decreases the risk of CVD events or all‑cause mortality. [9,19] This position stands in tension with the American Heart Association, which recommends no more than 2,300 mg of sodium per day and an ideal limit of less than 1,500 mg/day for most adults, particularly those with hypertension, and notes that even a reduction of about 1,000 mg/day can improve blood pressure. [20] Together, these findings suggest that very high added sugar intake is strongly associated with increased CVD mortality, while the benefits of aggressive sodium restriction below 2,300 mg/day in the general population remain less clearly established.

The Korean Dietary Context: Minimal Added Sugars with Elevated Sodium

This revised understanding of sugar-sodium interactions provides a coherent explanation for the divergent health outcomes observed between high-sodium Korean and Western dietary patterns. The critical distinction lies not solely in the form of sodium consumption but in the absence of added sugars accompanying that sodium.

Negligible Added Sugar Content

Traditional Korean dietary patterns are characterised by high intakes of rice, vegetables, legumes and fermented side dishes, and relatively low consumption of sugar‑sweetened beverages and confectionery compared with more Westernised patterns. [21-23] Recent analyses of Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data indicate that, in 2023, Koreans consumed on average 59.8 g/day of total sugar, of which 35.5 g/day originated from processed foods. [24] Sugar from processed foods accounted for approximately 7.7% of total energy intake, a level that remains within the World Health Organization guideline to limit free sugars to less than 10% of total energy. [24,25]

By contrast, adults in the United States consume, on average, about 17 teaspoons (approximately 68 g) of added sugar per day, corresponding to roughly 13–14% of total energy intake, and a sizeable proportion of the population derives 15–20% of total energy from added sugars. [26-28] Given the substantial evidence that high added sugar intake, particularly fructose, promotes insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia, and salt‑sensitive hypertension, [7,8,12,29] these compositional differences imply that high sodium intake in Korea is embedded within a markedly different metabolic milieu than in Western ultra‑processed dietary patterns. In a traditional Korean, relatively low‑sugar, minimally processed dietary context, the synergistic adverse effects of combined high salt and high added sugar are likely attenuated, and the physiological response to dietary sodium therefore occurs within a distinct metabolic environment. [7,8,12,22,24,28]

Fermented Foods as Protective Vehicles for Sodium

Korean fermented foods (including kimchi, doenjang or fermented soybean paste, ganjang or soy sauce, and gochujang or fermented red pepper paste) deliver sodium within a uniquely protective nutritional matrix: [30-33]

Absence of Added Sugars. Traditional formulations of Korean fermented seasonings such as doenjang, ganjang and cheonggukjang are primarily salted fermentations without added refined sweeteners, in contrast to many Western condiments where high sodium often co‑occurs with substantial added sugars. [30]

Bioactive Compound Production Through Fermentation. Lactic acid bacteria, isoflavonoids, and bioactive peptides generated during fermentation demonstrate anti-hypertensive properties. Controlled animal studies reveal that rats administered doenjang containing 8% salt by weight exhibit significantly lower blood pressure and adiposity compared to rats receiving equivalent quantities of non-fermented salt. Similar anti-hypertensive effects have been documented for gochujang despite substantial salt content. [30-33]

Probiotic Enhancement of Sodium Excretion. Kimchi is a rich source of lactic acid bacteria, and both whole kimchi and kimchi‑derived probiotic strains have demonstrated beneficial effects on metabolic parameters, including body weight and glycaemic control, as well as anti‑inflammatory actions. Together with evidence from fermented soybean products showing altered electrolyte handling and RAAS modulation, these findings suggest that the microbial components of Korean fermented foods may favourably influence both sodium handling and insulin sensitivity, although direct evidence for enhanced renal sodium excretion in humans remains limited. [31-37]

Potassium-Rich Vegetable Matrix. The napa cabbage, radish, allium species, and ginger incorporated into kimchi provide substantial potassium, which physiologically antagonizes sodium’s pressor effects. [36] In a 12‑year prospective cohort of 5,932 Korean adults, higher total kimchi intake was not associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension after multivariable adjustment, despite the high salt content of these fermented vegetables. [38]

Investigators have characterized this phenomenon as a “salt paradox within the Korean Paradox”: bioactive compounds present in fermented foods actively counteract the hypertensive potential of their sodium content. The protective mechanisms involve multiple pathways including probiotic modulation of gut-systemic inflammation, bioactive peptide-mediated downregulation of the renin-angiotensin system, and the comprehensive anti-inflammatory effects of traditional fermentation processes. [30,33,34,36,37,39]

Comprehensive Dietary Pattern Analysis

The protective effects extend beyond fermented foods to encompass the entire traditional Korean dietary pattern (K-diet), which establishes a metabolic environment fundamentally distinct from Western dietary contexts where sodium demonstrates pathological effects: [40-43]

Dietary ComponentTraditional Korean DietTypical Western DietMetabolic Consequence
Added sugars7.7% of total calories (35.5g/day)15-17% of total calories (77g/day)Prevention of insulin-mediated sodium retention
Vegetable consumptionVery high (543g/day)Moderate to lowElevated potassium counterbalances sodium
Dietary fiber41.5g/dayApproximately 15-20g/dayAttenuated glucose absorption, enhanced insulin sensitivity
Ultra-processed foodsMinimalPredominant caloric sourceAvoidance of salt-sugar synergistic effects
Animal-derived saturated fatLow (2.3% of energy)HighReduced inflammatory burden, improved endothelial function
Glycemic loadLowHighStable insulin secretion, absence of pathological sodium retention

A controlled dietary intervention conducted at CHA University demonstrated the anti-inflammatory capacity of this pattern. Subjects consuming a traditional K-diet for two weeks exhibited significantly elevated anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 concentrations and reduced pro-inflammatory nuclear factor kappa B activity, with a Dietary Inflammatory Index score of −0.94 (anti-inflammatory) compared to +1.04 (pro-inflammatory) for a Westernized control diet. [43]

The K‑diet is rich in fibre, non‑starchy vegetables, legumes and whole grains, and low in added sugars and animal fats, a composition consistent with a relatively low dietary glycemic load. Controlled feeding studies comparing Korean‑style mixed meals with Western meals have shown similar glycaemic and insulin responses but more favourable postprandial triglyceride profiles with Korean meals, supporting the view that traditional Korean meal patterns promote more stable postprandial metabolic responses than Westernised patterns. [43-46]

Given that high intakes of added sugars, particularly fructose, promote insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia and that hyperinsulinaemia enhances renal sodium reabsorption and contributes to salt‑sensitive hypertension, the relatively low added sugar content and high fibre load of the K‑diet are likely to attenuate this pathway. Although direct measurements of renal sodium handling were not performed in the K‑diet trial, it is plausible that, within this dietary context, sodium is handled under conditions of lower insulin demand and greater insulin sensitivity, reducing the risk of pathological sodium retention compared with high‑sugar Western diets. [7,11,12,29]

Together with mechanistic evidence on sugar‑induced insulin resistance and salt‑sensitive hypertension, these findings suggest that high sodium intake within a low‑sugar, anti‑inflammatory dietary pattern such as the K‑diet may have different haemodynamic and renal implications than equivalent sodium intake in a high‑sugar Western dietary context. [7,11,12]

Additional Population-Level Protective Factors

South Korea’s 36.5% overweight/obesity prevalence (approximately 20 percentage points below the 56.4% OECD average) indicates that fewer Koreans exhibit the insulin resistance phenotype that exacerbates pathological sodium retention. [47] Lower obesity prevalence directly correlates with reduced hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and CVD incidence, partially neutralizing cardiovascular stress from multiple sources including dietary sodium. [11,29]

Korean fermented foods provide distinctive micronutrient profiles that support cardiometabolic health. Investigators at Seoul National University identified substantial cobalamin (vitamin B-12) content in doenjang, ganjang, and kimchi. These nutrients are typically exclusive to animal-derived foods. This explains the absence of cobalamin deficiency in elderly Korean populations consuming minimal meat, thereby protecting against the CVD and cognitive decline associated with hyperhomocysteinemia that affects approximately 30% of elderly Western populations. [48-50]

South Korea’s universal health coverage system, implemented progressively from 1977 and achieving complete population coverage within 12 years, ensures comprehensive preventive care and early therapeutic intervention. With an avoidable mortality rate of 151 per 100,000 population (substantially below the OECD average of 228.6) and infant mortality of 2.5 per 1,000 live births, Korea’s healthcare infrastructure provides critical population health benefits that extend life expectancy. [51]

A Spectrum of Cardiometabolic Risk

Integration of sugar-sodium interaction data reveals a continuum of cardiometabolic risk wherein the combination and context of nutrients prove more consequential than isolated nutrient quantities. At the extreme end of this spectrum, ultra-processed Western dietary patterns combining elevated added sugars with high sodium produce synergistic metabolic pathology. [6,7,12] Fructose-induced hyperinsulinemia promotes renal sodium retention, while elevated plasma osmolality from sodium stimulates endogenous fructose synthesis. These converging mechanisms generate hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, chronic systemic inflammation, and progressive endothelial dysfunction. These conditions collectively account for substantial cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Western populations.

Added sugars consumed independent of excessive sodium remain metabolically deleterious. Fructose metabolism induces insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, hypertriglyceridemia, systemic inflammation, hyperuricemia, and direct vascular pathology through multiple molecular pathways even in the absence of elevated sodium intake. [7,18,53,54] The CVD burden attributable to these sugar-mediated mechanisms alone appears substantial, suggesting that added sugars represent a primary rather than secondary contributor to metabolic dysfunction.

By contrast, moderately elevated sodium intake in the absence of added sugars and in the context of potassium-rich whole foods demonstrates considerably attenuated pathological effects. Sodium exerts problematic cardiovascular consequences primarily when combined with refined carbohydrates, in genetically salt-sensitive populations (representing a minority), or when consumed without adequate potassium intake. The 2013 Institute of Medicine systematic review’s conclusion that insufficient evidence supports universal aggressive sodium restriction below 2,300 mg/day reflects this more nuanced understanding of sodium’s context-dependent effects. [17]

At the most favorable position along this risk continuum lies the traditional Korean dietary pattern: sodium derived predominantly from fermented vegetables and traditional preparations (approximately 1.6 times the WHO recommendation), consumed within a nutritional context characterized by minimal added sugars (7.7% of total calories), elevated potassium from abundant produce, and an anti-inflammatory whole-food matrix. This combination produces minimal cardiovascular harm and may confer net health benefits through fermentation-derived bioactive compounds that actively counteract sodium’s potential hypertensive effects. [24,30,32,39,43] The Korean epidemiological data (exceptional longevity despite elevated sodium intake) provides compelling population-level evidence for the protective capacity of this dietary context.

This risk spectrum illustrates that dietary pattern quality fundamentally modifies individual nutrient effects. The metabolic consequences of sodium intake cannot be accurately assessed without considering the broader nutritional matrix, particularly the presence or absence of added sugars, the potassium-to-sodium ratio, the degree of food processing, and the inflammatory potential of the overall dietary pattern. Current evidence suggests that public health recommendations focused predominantly on sodium reduction, while ignoring the substantially greater metabolic impact of added sugars, may have fundamentally misallocated dietary intervention priorities. [6,7,18,43,55]

Limitations and Caveats

This analysis does not suggest that sodium is physiologically benign or that unlimited consumption is advisable. Several important qualifications merit consideration:

Gastric malignancy risk. Korea’s elevated sodium intake contributes to approximately 30,000 annual gastric cancer diagnoses, with salted vegetables accounting for 16% of incident cases. Korea and Japan (both characterized by high-sodium, soup-predominant culinary traditions) demonstrate among the world’s highest gastric cancer incidence rates. High-sodium diets amplify fructose-triggered metabolic cascades by increasing plasma osmolality and stimulating endogenous fructose production. [56-59]

Optimal intake range. Korean national epidemiological data demonstrate a U-shaped mortality curve wherein both very low (less than 2,500 mg/day) and very high (exceeding 6,500 mg/day) sodium intakes associate with increased mortality risk. The apparent optimal range for Korean populations is 3,000–4,200 mg/day, which aligns closely with current Korean consumption patterns (3,136 mg/day average) yet exceeds WHO guidelines while remaining below historical Korean consumption levels. [60]

Individual genetic variation. Salt-sensitive phenotypes exist and benefit meaningfully from sodium restriction. The critical insight is not that sodium is universally benign, but rather that the relative contributions of added sugars versus sodium to cardiometabolic disease have been systematically misestimated, particularly in Western dietary contexts where both nutrients appear synergistically in ultra-processed foods. [6,17,61]

Conclusions

The Korean Salt Paradox fundamentally concerns metabolic context rather than sodium per se. Specifically, it highlights the profound physiological differences between consuming sodium within traditional whole-food dietary patterns essentially devoid of excessive added sugars (7.7% of total calories) versus consuming sodium alongside the fructose-predominant ultra-processed foods (15–17% of total calories from added sugars) characteristic of Western nutrition.

Korean longevity occurs despite rather than because of elevated sodium intake (1.6 times WHO recommendation), with protection conferred by:

  • Minimal added sugars (7.7% of calories) preventing insulin-mediated sodium retention
  • Fermented foods delivering sodium with bioactive protective compounds
  • Elevated potassium intake from vegetables counterbalancing sodium
  • Low glycemic load maintaining insulin sensitivity
  • Minimal ultra-processed food consumption avoiding salt-sugar synergy
  • Low obesity prevalence (36.5%) preventing insulin resistance
  • Universal healthcare providing comprehensive preventive care

As DiNicolantonio et al. conclude: “It is time for guideline committees to shift focus away from salt and focus greater attention to the likely more-consequential food additive: sugar”.

The evidence supports neither increased sodium consumption nor sodium liberalization, but rather emphasizes dietary pattern quality: whole foods, fermented vegetables, abundant produce, minimal added sugars, and low glycemic load. Within this nutritional framework, the moderate sodium content of traditional fermented foods presents minimal cardiovascular risk, while the added sugars ubiquitous in Western ultra-processed foods represent a substantially greater metabolic threat.

References

  1. Park HK, Lee Y, Kang BW, Kwon K, Kim JW, Kwon OS, et al. Progress on sodium reduction in South Korea. BMJ Global Health [Internet]. 2020 May 1;5(5):e002028. Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/5/e002028
  2. Lee JY, Kwon SO, Lee SH, Seo MJ, Lee GH, Kim C. Dietary sodium and potassium intake of Koreans estimated using 2 different sources of their contents in foods, Food & Nutrient Database and the Korean Total Diet Study: a comparative study. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition. 2023;28(3):235.
  3. World Health Organization. Sodium reduction [Internet]. who.int. World Health Organization; 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sodium-reduction
  4. Health at a Glance 2025: Korea [Internet]. Oecd.org. 2025. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/health-at-a-glance-2025_15a55280-en/korea_40b1d2b4-en.html
  5. Kontis V, Bennett JE, Mathers CD, Li G, Foreman K, Ezzati M. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. The Lancet [Internet]. 2017 Apr;389(10076):1323–35. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)32381-9/fulltext
  6. DiNicolantonio JJ, Lucan SC. The wrong white crystals: Not salt but sugar as aetiological in hypertension and cardiometabolic disease. Open Heart [Internet]. 2014 Nov;1(1):e000167. Available from: https://openheart.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000167
  7. Khitan Z, Kim DH. Fructose: A Key Factor in the Development of Metabolic Syndrome and Hypertension. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism [Internet]. 2013;2013:1–12. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jnme/2013/682673/
  8. Klein AV, Kiat H. The mechanisms underlying fructose-induced hypertension. Journal of Hypertension. 2015 May;33(5):912–20.
  9. McGuire S. Institute of Medicine. 2013. Sodium Intake in Populations: Assessment of Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013. Advances in Nutrition. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):19–20.
  10. DiNicolantonio JJ, O’Keefe JH. Hypertension Due to Toxic White Crystals in the Diet: Should We Blame Salt or Sugar? Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016 Nov;59(3):219–25.
  11. Horita S, Seki G, Yamada H, Suzuki M, Koike K, Fujita T. Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Hypertension, and Renal Sodium Transport. International Journal of Hypertension. 2011;2011:1–8.
  12. Komnenov D, Levanovich P, Rossi N. Hypertension Associated with Fructose and High Salt: Renal and Sympathetic Mechanisms. Nutrients. 2019 Mar 7;11(3):569.
  13. Féraille E, Marsy S, Barlet-Bas C, Rousselot M, Cheval L, Favre H, et al. Insulin unresponsiveness of tubular monovalent cation transport during fructose-induced hypertension in rats. Clinical science (London, England : 1979) [Internet]. 1995 Mar;88(3):293–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7736697/
  14. Siddiqui SH, Rossi NF. Acute Intake of Fructose Increases Arterial Pressure in Humans: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Nutrients [Internet]. 2024 Jan 1;16(2):219. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/2/219
  15. Softic S, Cohen DE, Kahn CR. Role of Dietary Fructose and Hepatic De Novo Lipogenesis in Fatty Liver Disease. Digestive diseases and sciences [Internet]. 2016;61(5):1282–93. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26856717
  16. Gonzalez-Vicente A, Cabral P, Hong N, Asirwatham J, Yang N, Berthiaume J, et al. Dietary Fructose Enhances the Ability of Low Concentrations of Angiotensin II to Stimulate Proximal Tubule Na+ Reabsorption. Nutrients. 2017 Aug 16;9(8):885–5.
  17. Sánchez-Lozada LG, Madero M, Marilda Mazzali, Feig DI, Nakagawa T, Lanaspa MA, et al. Sugar, salt, immunity, and the cause of primary hypertension. 2023 Mar 23;
  18. Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, Flanders WD, Merritt R, Hu FB. Added Sugar Intake and Cardiovascular Diseases Mortality among US Adults. JAMA internal medicine [Internet]. 2014 Apr;174(4):516–24. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24493081
  19. Strom BL, Yaktine AL, Oria M, et al. Sodium Intake and Health Outcomes [Internet]. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. National Academies Press (US); 2013. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201520/
  20. Lifestyle + Risk Reduction [Internet]. Available from: https://www.heart.org/-/media/files/health-topics/answers-by-heart/why-should-i-limit-sodium.pdf
  21. Yu H, Chung SJ. Total sugar intake and its contributed foods by age groups in Koreans using the 8th (2019–2021) Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: a cross-sectional study. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition. 2024 Jun 30;29(3):222–33.
  22. Ha K, Chung S, Joung H, Song Y. Dietary sugar intake and dietary behaviors in Korea: a pooled study of 2,599 children and adolescents aged 9-14 years. Nutrition Research and Practice. 2016;10(5):537.
  23. Kim J, Jo I, Joung H. A Rice-Based Traditional Dietary Pattern Is Associated with Obesity in Korean Adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2012 Feb;112(2):246–53.
  24. Yeon S, Lee J, Yun S, Oh K. Intake of Dietary Sugar in the Republic of Korea: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Jugan Geongang Gwa Jilbyeong. 2026;19(5):253-267. doi:10.56786/PHWR.2026.19.5.2
  25. World Health Organization. Guideline : sugars intake for adults and children. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028
  26. Harvard T.H. Chan. Added Sugar [Internet]. The Nutrition Source. 2013. Available from: https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/carbohydrates/added-sugar-in-the-diet/
  27. DiFrancesco L, Fulgoni VL, Gaine PC, Scott MO, Ricciuto L. Trends in added sugars intake and sources among U.S. adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2018. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022 Aug 18;9.
  28. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2020. Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.
  29. Soleimani M, Barone S, Luo H, Zahedi K. Pathogenesis of Hypertension in Metabolic Syndrome: The Role of Fructose and Salt. 2023 Feb 21;24(5):4294–4.
  30. Mun EG, Cha YS. Korean Traditional Fermented Foods (KTFFs): Antiobesity Effects and Salt Paradox. ACS symposium series. 2019 Jan 1;121–34.
  31. Woo H, Han A, Park JE, Cha YS. Korean fermented soybean paste (Doenjang) has anti-obesity and anti-hypertensive effects via the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. PloS one [Internet]. 2023;18(10):e0291762. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37862361/
  32. Mun EG, Park JE, Cha YS. Effects of Doenjang, a Traditional Korean Soybean Paste, with High-Salt Diet on Blood Pressure in Sprague–Dawley Rats. Nutrients [Internet]. 2019 Nov 12 [cited 2020 Aug 6];11(11). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893577/
  33. Park JE, Han A, Mun EG, Cha YS. A traditional Korean fermented food, Gochujang exerts anti-hypertensive effects, regardless of its high salt content by regulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in SD rats. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024 Apr 28 [cited 2024 Jun 7];10(9):e30451. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079108/
  34. Lee M, Kim D, Chang JY. Metabolites of Kimchi Lactic Acid Bacteria, Indole-3-Lactic Acid, Phenyllactic Acid, and Leucic Acid, Inhibit Obesity-Related Inflammation in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2023 Oct 31;34(2):306–13.
  35. Oh MR, Jang HY, Lee SY, Jung SJ, Chae SW, Lee SO, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum HAC01 Supplementation Improves Glycemic Control in Prediabetic Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2021 Jul 8;13(7):2337.
  36. Park KY, Jeong JK, Lee YE, Daily JW. Health benefits of kimchi (Korean fermented vegetables) as a probiotic food. Journal of medicinal food. 2014;17(1):6–20.
  37. Woo H, Park JE, Cha Y. Renin-angiotensin System (RAS)-mediated Antiobesity and Antihypertensive Effects of Korean Traditional Soybean Paste (Doenjang) in Rat Model of Diet-induced Obesity (P08-097-19). Current Developments in Nutrition [Internet]. 2019 Jun [cited 2026 Feb 27];3:nzz044.P08-09719. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818949/
  38. Song H, Park Phd SJ, Jang J, Kwon Y, Lee HJ. High consumption of salt-fermented vegetables and hypertension risk in adults: a 12-year follow-up study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2017;26(4):698–707. Available from: https://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/26/4/698.pdf
  39. Woo H, Park JE, Cha YS. Korean Traditional Fermented Soybean Paste (Doenjang) Regulate Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Current Developments in Nutrition. 2020 May 29;4(Supplement_2):791–1.
  40. Choi Jae-hee. Korean men consume 30% more sodium than women: KFDA – The Korea Herald [Internet]. The Korea Herald. 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10521873
  41. Kwak Yeon-soo. Noodles, dumplings, kimchi among top sources of sodium in Koreans’ diets [Internet]. Koreatimes.co.kr. The Korea Times; 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/health/20250701/noodles-dumplings-kimchi-among-top-sources-of-sodium-in-koreans-diets
  42. Himedi Inc. How the Korean Diet Differs from the American Diet (And Why It Matters) [Internet]. Himedi. 2026. Available from: https://himedi.com/blogs/blog/how-the-korean-diet-differs-from-the-american-diet-and-why-it-matters
  43. Shin PK, Park SJ, Kim MS, Kwon DY, Kim MJ, Kim K, et al. A Traditional Korean Diet with a Low Dietary Inflammatory Index Increases Anti-Inflammatory IL-10 and Decreases Pro-Inflammatory NF-κB in a Small Dietary Intervention Study. Nutrients. 2020 Aug 16;12(8):2468.
  44. Jung SJ, Kim MG, Park TS, Kim YG, Song WO, Chae SW. Rice-based Korean meals (bibimbap and kimbap) have lower glycemic responses and postprandial-triglyceride effects than energy-matched Western meals. Journal of Ethnic Foods. 2015 Dec;2(4):154–61.
  45. Kim MJ, Hur HJ, Jang DJ, Kim MS, Park S, Yang HJ. Inverse association of a traditional Korean diet composed of a multigrain rice-containing meal with fruits and nuts with metabolic syndrome risk: The KoGES. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022 Nov 10;9.
  46. 채련. The effects of Korean-DASH diet on metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and gut microbiota. Snuackr [Internet]. 2016 Aug [cited 2026 Feb 27]; Available from: https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/128428
  47. Ung P. 1 in 3 Koreans now obese, highlighting mounting disease risks [Internet]. Koreatimes.co.kr. The Korea Times; 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20251111/1-in-3-koreans-now-obese-highlighting-mounting-disease-risks
  48. Kwak CS, Lee MS, Lee HJ, Whang JY, Park SC. Dietary source of vitamin B12 intake and vitamin B12 status in female elderly Koreans aged 85 and older living in rural area. Nutrition Research and Practice. 2010;4(3):229.
  49. Agarwal R. Vitamin B12 deficiency & cognitive impairment in elderly population. The Indian Journal of Medical Research [Internet]. 2011 Oct;134(4):410. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3237236/
  50. Mallikarjun DN, Malo PK, Mensegere A, Partha A, Sundarakumar JS, Isaac TG, et al. Comparison of homocysteine, vitamin B12 and folic acid between rural and urban ageing Indians and its association with mild cognitive impairment and cardiovascular risk factors: a cross-sectional analysis. Brain Communications [Internet]. 2024 Oct 15 [cited 2025 Feb 23];6(5):fcae343. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/article/6/5/fcae343/7822199
  51. Kwon S. Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage. Health Policy and Planning. 2008 Nov 12;24(1):63–71.
  52. Ung P. Korea’s life expectancy reaches 83.5 years, among highest in OECD [Internet]. Koreatimes.co.kr. The Korea Times; 2025. Available from: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20250731/koreas-life-expectancy-reaches-835-years-among-highest-in-oecd
  53. Jia G, Aroor AR, Whaley-Connell AT, Sowers JR. Fructose and Uric Acid: Is There a Role in Endothelial Function? Current Hypertension Reports. 2014 Apr 24;16(6).
  54. McMullen MK. Fructose Increases Uric Acid Contributing to Metabolic Syndrome – Herbal, Nutritional and Dietary Strategies to Reduce Uric Acid. OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine. 2018 Sep 28;3(3):1–1.
  55. Shim JS. Ultra-processed foods and total sugars intake in Korea: evidence from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2016–2018. Nutrition Research and Practice. 2022;16(4):476.
  56. Cho HJ, Woo HD, Park S, Choi WJ, Kim JH, Kweon SS, et al. Gastric and colorectal cancer incidence attributable to dietary factors in Korea. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology [Internet]. 2024 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Oct 19];15(3):963–73. Available from: https://jgo.amegroups.org/article/view/87234/html
  57. Fay S. Salt: shaking up the link with stomach cancer [Internet]. World Cancer Research Fund. 2016. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/about-us/news-and-blogs/salt-shaking-up-the-link-with-stomach-cancer/
  58. Kim J, Park S, Nam BH. Gastric cancer and salt preference: a population-based cohort study in Korea. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010 Mar 10;91(5):1289–93.
  59. Lanaspa MA, Kuwabara M, Andres-Hernando A, Li N, Cicerchi C, Jensen T, et al. High salt intake causes leptin resistance and obesity in mice by stimulating endogenous fructose production and metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018 Mar 5;115(12):3138–43.
  60. Clara Yongjoo Park, Jo G, Ju Hee Lee, Singh G, Jong Tae Lee, Min Jeong Shin. Association between dietary sodium intake and disease burden and mortality in Koreans between 1998 and 2016: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrition Research and Practice. 2020 Jan 1;14(5):501–1.
  61. Cubeddu LX. Epigenetics of the blood pressure reactivity to salt: Is the salt sensitive phenotype correctable? Bioimpacts [Internet]. 2023 Jun 21;13(5):355–5. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10509743/

Discover more from A1C Almanac

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading