A1C Almanac

Main Page

From Negative Bias to Resilient Circuits in Experience‑Dependent Brain Plasticity, Emotional Health, Metabolic Wellness, and Cognitive Aging

Posted

by

dr Karunia Valeriani Japar

Table of Contents
Category:

Introduction

Neuroplasticity denotes the brain’s capacity to modify its structure and function in response to internal and external stimuli, encompassing experiences, behaviours, and metabolic signals across the lifespan. Contrary to earlier views that regarded the adult brain as largely immutable, converging evidence now demonstrates substantial potential for synaptic remodelling, neurogenesis in select regions, and large-scale function reorganization well into older age. This dynamic adaptability underlies core processes such as learning and memory, yet also confers vulnerability to maladaptive remodelling in the setting of chronic stress, metabolic dysregulation, or persistent negative cognitive-emotional patterns, thereby positioning neuroplasticity at the interface of brain resilience and neurodegeneration.

A growing body of affective neuroscience indicates that recurrent cognitive and emotional habits such as chronic, complaining rumination, and catastrophizing can bias neural networks toward heightened threat detection and negative salience. Repeated activation of stress-responsive circuits is thought to strengthen synaptic pathways that prioritize negative stimuli, progressively elevating baseline stress levels, emotional reactivity, and susceptibility to anxiety and depressive symptoms. In parallel, lifestyle factors including physical activity, cognitive engagement, stress management practices, diet quality, and sleep architecture modulate neurotrophic signalling, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and adult neurogenesis, collectively shaping the neuroplastic trajectory of the aging brain.

Within the domains of longevity medicine and preventive metabolic health, neuroplasticity emerges as double-edged phenomenon: the same biological processes that enable adaptation and repair can also entrench maladaptive circuits under conditions of persistent metabolic stress, sedentary behaviour, or entrenched negative cognitive styles. Elucidating how daily experiences, emotion regulation strategies, and metabolic status converge on shared neuroplastic mechanisms provides a rationale for designing targeted interventions that intentionally “rewire” brain networks toward greater resilience, more adaptive affective tone, and preservation of cognitive function across aging. Emerging evidence suggests that multimodal strategies combining structured exercise, cognitive training, stress reduction techniques, and targeted nutritional support may not only attenuate age-related cognitive decline but also translate neuroplastic gains into extended health span and improved quality of life in later years.

Biological Basis of Neuroplasticity Across the Lifespan

Neuroplasticity encompasses multiple, hierarchically organized forms of adaptive remodelling, including synaptic plasticity structural plasticity, adult neurogenesis, and large-scale network reorganization, all of which remain operative, though often attenuated, in the aging brain. Synaptic plasticity mechanisms such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) adjust the strength of synaptic transmission in response to activity patterns, serving as the cellular substrate for learning, memory, and adaptation to environmental demands. Structural plasticity, encompassing dendritic spine remodelling and axonal spouting, refines synaptic connectivity in response to use, disuse, and injury, while adult hippocampal neurogenesis contributes to pattern separation, mood regulation, and cognitive flexibility [1,2,3,4,5,6].

Aging is associated with region-specific reductions in gray matter volume, synaptic density, and plasticity capacity, particularly in hippocampal and prefrontal circuits that are critical for memory consolidations and executive function. Age-related declines in NMDA receptor-dependent LTP have been consistently documented in rodent models, often accompanied by a compensatory shift toward NMDA receptor-independent plasticity mechanisms mediated by L-type voltage-gated calcium channels in cognitively preserved older animals, suggesting adaptive neural remodelling in response to aging. LTD mechanisms, conversely, tend to be enhance with aging, reflecting an imbalance that may render aged synaptic populations more susceptible to weakening and less capable of forming robust, enduring synaptic modifications required for new memory formation. Nevertheless, preserved or enhanced neuroplasticity in individuals with higher cognitive reserve, healthier lifestyles, and better metabolic control appears to mitigate the clinical expression of neurodegenerative pathology, even when substantial neuropathological burden is present [1,2,7,8,9,10].

Key molecular mediators of neuroplasticity include neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (     VEGF), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which collectively support synaptic maintenance, adult neurogenesis, and angiogenesis, a s well as signalling pathways that regulate neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular stress resistance. BDNF, in particular, enhances synaptic transmission, promotes dendritic spine formation, and facilitates both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms underlying LTP, while also modulating mitochondrial function and resistance to oxidative stress. Age-related declined in circulating and central levels of these neurotrophic factors have been associated with hippocampal atrophy, decreased cerebrovascular density, and accelerated cognitive decline, underscoring their pivotal role in maintaining neuroplastic capacity across the lifespan [11,12,13].

Importantly, neuroplasticity is not intrinsically beneficial; rather it is value-neutral and direction-dependent, strengthening whichever neural circuits are most consistently engaged regardless of their adaptive value. This means that repetitive exposure to chronic stress, sleep deprivation, or maladaptive thought patterns can consolidate dysfunctional networks with the same efficiency that enriched environments consolidate adaptive ones. Chronic stress, for instance, induces structural remodelling in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus that impairs executive function and emotion regulation, while simultaneously strengthening  amygdala circuits involved in threat processing, illustrating maladaptive neuroplasticity that perpetuates vulnerability to anxiety, depression, and cognitive decline. From a preventive and longevity perspective, the task is therefore not merely to stimulate plasticity in a nonspecific manner, but to strategically bias neuroplastic processes toward circuits that support emotional regulation, metabolic stability, and cognitive reserve, particularly during midlife when many trajectories of late-life brain health and resilience are established [1,7,14,15,16].

Negative Thought Patterns, Stress Circuitry, and Maladaptive Plasticity

Chronic complaining and persistent negative appraisal of daily events represent an accessible, everyday example of how cognitive style can drive maladaptive neuroplasticity. Repeatedly focusing on threats, frustrations, and perceived injustices activates neural networks involved in threat detection and stress processing, including the amygdala anterior cingulate cortex, and stress-related hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis pathways. Over time, frequent activation of these circuits strengthens synaptic connections within the “negative salience” network, rendering the brain more efficient at detecting, encoding, and recalling negative information while potentially rendering prefrontal regulatory networks less capable of inhibiting amygdala-driven threat responses [14,17,18,19,20].

Figure 1. Overview of RSA for brain data and searchlight procedure for the fMRI task

This process can shift affective set‑points, leading to higher baseline stress, emotional volatility, and a cognitive bias toward pessimism or fear‑based interpretations, even in relatively neutral contexts. Dispositionally negative individuals often report tonically elevated negative affect in the absence of clear and imminent stressors, suggesting that chronic patterns of negative thought consolidate neural architectures that sustain heightened stress independent of environmental triggers. Experimental and observational work in affective neuroscience suggests that such biases are maintained by feedback loops in which negative interpretations elicit stronger physiological arousal and stress responses, including cortisol release, further reinforcing the underlying circuits and amplifying future reactivity to ambiguous or mildly negative stimuli. Rumination, a specific pattern of repetitive negative thought about past events or current distress, has been associated with over‑recruitment of frontoparietal cognitive control circuits, reflecting inefficient neural processing when demands for inhibitory control are high, and this over‑activation is further associated with state fear and negative affect [14,17,19,20,21,22,23].

Over longer time scales, chronic activation of stress pathways contributes to neuroinflammation, impaired adult hippocampal neurogenesis, and hippocampal vulnerability, thereby linking maladaptive cognitive habits to both mental health symptoms and accelerated cognitive aging. Peripheral and central inflammatory mediators, including interleukin‑6 (IL‑6), tumor necrosis factor‑alpha (TNF‑α), and interleukin‑1 beta (IL‑1β), disrupt the proliferation, maturation, and survival of newborn neurons in the hippocampus, and this disruption is thought to underlie many of the cognitive and mood disturbances associated with chronic stress, metabolic disease, and aging. HPA axis dysfunction resulting from sustained glucocorticoid exposure impairs glucocorticoid receptor‑mediated negative feedback, perpetuating stress pathway activation and further suppressing neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal and prefrontal regions critical for memory and emotional regulation [14,17,24,25].

Figure 2. Proposed pathways showing the converging effects of chronic peripheral inflammatory disease on neurogenesis and behavior [24]

At the same time, the same neuroplastic mechanisms that entrench negative bias can be harnessed to reorient networks toward more adaptive patterns through structured cognitive and behavioural interventions. Practices that cultivate cognitive reappraisal, gratitude, solution‑focused thinking, and mindfulness have been associated with functional and structural changes in prefrontal and limbic circuits implicated in emotion regulation, including increased activation in dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, enhanced prefrontal–amygdala connectivity, and reduced amygdala reactivity to negative stimuli. Gratitude interventions, for instance, modulate functional connectivity in emotion‑ and motivation‑related brain networks, reduce heart rate, and foster temporal synchronization between brain activity and autonomic nervous system function, suggesting integrated central and peripheral mechanisms of emotional regulation. Cognitive reappraisal, which involves reframing thoughts and responses to emotional stimuli, is positively associated with psychological well‑being and appears to mediate the relationship between emotional regulation challenges and depressive symptoms, particularly in individuals who also report higher levels of gratitude [26,27,28,29,30].

These findings underscore that “mental hygiene” is not merely a psychological construct but is biologically instantiated in neural architecture, offering a concrete and modifiable entry point for lifestyle-based brain longevity strategies. By deliberately engaging cognitive and emotional regulatory practices, individuals can leverage neuroplasticity to shift from maladaptive, stress-amplifying circuits toward more resilient networks that support emotional stability, metabolic health, and preserved cognitive function across the lifespan [14,17,26,29].

Lifestyle Modulators of Neuroplasticity in Aging

Several modifiable lifestyle factors have been repeatedly shown to influence neuroplasticity substrates and brain aging trajectories, including physical activity, cognitive engagement, diet quality, stress management, and sleep. Aerobic exercise, resistance training, and complex motor activities increase circulating and central levels of BDNF and other neurotrophic factors, enhance regional cerebral blood flow, particularly to the hippocampus and promote adult hipoccampal neurogenesis, leading to measurable improvements in memory and executive function in older adults. A landmark randomized controlled trial demonstrated that one year of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise increased anterior hippocampal volume by approximately 2%, effectively reversing age‑related volumetric loss by 1 to 2 years, with increases in hippocampal volume correlating significantly with elevated serum BDNF concentrations. Hippocampal cerebral blood flow exhibits a preferential and rapid rebound hyperemic response following acute bouts of exercise, with individuals displaying the lowest baseline regional perfusion demonstrating the greatest and most rapid exercise‑induced increases in hippocampal blood flow, suggesting that those with early vascular compromise possess the greatest potential for therapeutic benefit from physical activity interventions. Beyond central neuroplastic effects, exercise modulates systemic inflammation, improves insulin sensitivity, and supports vascular endothelial health, thereby addressing both central and peripheral contributors to brain aging and cognitive decline [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].

Cognitive engagement, encompassing education, mentally demanding occupations, bilingualism, and structured cognitive training has been consistently linked to higher cognitive reserve and lower risk of incident dementia, even in the presence of substantial underlying neuropathology. Bilingualism, in particular, has emerged as a robust proxy for cognitive reserve, with bilingual individuals presenting with dementia symptoms approximately 4 to 5 years later than matched monolinguals, despite demonstrating greater cerebral hypometabolism and neuropathological burden at comparable clinical stages of disease. These activities appear to enhance synaptic density, promote network efficiency, and facilitate compensatory recruitment of alternative circuits, effectively raising the threshold at which structural brain changes translate into clinically observable cognitive impairment. Neuroimaging studies reveal that bilingual older adults exhibit greater white matter density in frontal lobes, anterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal lobules, and temporal pole regions, reflecting lifelong overuse of executive control systems required to manage two language systems without interference [7,38,39].

Diet patterns characterized by abundant whole foods, polyphenols, omega‑3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (particularly docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid), and essential micronutrients, alongside avoidance of chronic hyperglycemia and ultra-processed foods further modulate modulate neuroplasticity by reducing neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic insults to neural tissue. The Mediterranean diet, rich in antioxidants, polyphenols from extra virgin olive oil and plant foods, and marine‑derived omega‑3 fatty acids, has been associated with 30 to 50 percent reductions in dementia risk and exerts neuroprotective effects through multiple converging mechanisms including reduction of oxidative damage, modulation of inflammatory pathways, enhancement of synaptic plasticity, and epigenetic modifications that downregulate pro‑inflammatory gene expression while upregulating antioxidant pathways. Polyphenols and omega‑3 fatty acids exhibit synergistic effects when consumed together, improving antioxidant capacity and reducing neuroinflammation more effectively than either component alone, underscoring the importance of whole dietary patterns rather than isolated nutrients [40,41,42].

Figure 3. Representative image showcasing key components of the Mediterranean diet and their pivotal role in supporting mental health [42]

Stress‑reduction practices such as meditation, yoga, and controlled breathing techniques influence neuroplasticity by down‑regulating HPA axis activity, reducing amygdala reactivity, and strengthening prefrontal cortical regulatory networks involved in executive control and emotion regulation. A randomized controlled trial demonstrated that three days of intensive mindfulness meditation training significantly reduced resting‑state functional connectivity between the right amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex compared to a well‑matched relaxation control intervention, with pre–post training reductions in amygdala–anterior cingulate connectivity associating with lower cumulative markers of HPA axis activation over a 4‑month follow‑up period. Yoga practice has been linked to increased gray matter volume in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex, with dose‑dependent relationships observed between weekly practice frequency and structural brain changes, as well as functional alterations including decreased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during working memory tasks and reduced amygdala reactivity to negative affective stimuli [43,44,45].

Figure 4. Yoga Mechanisms [44]

Sleep, often under‑emphasized in preventive brain health strategies, supports synaptic homeostasis, facilitates memory consolidation, and enables glymphatic clearance of neurotoxic metabolic waste, with chronic sleep restriction impairing neuroplastic responses and accelerating cognitive decline. The glymphatic system, a brain wide perivascular pathway for cerebrospinal fluid influx and interstitial solute clearance is predominantly active during sleep, particularly during slow‑wave (N3) sleep, when norepinephrine levels decline and extracellular space volume expands by up to 60 percent, reducing resistance to fluid flow and enabling an 80 to 90 percent increase in metabolite clearance relative to the waking state. Sleep deprivation impairs hippocampal neurogenesis, disrupts synaptic plasticity mechanisms essential for memory formation, increases neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, and accelerates accumulation of amyloid‑beta peptides, a hallmark pathological feature of Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiological data reveal a U‑shaped relationship between sleep duration and cognitive decline risk, with optimal sleep duration around 7.2 hours; both insufficient and excessive sleep associate with elevated risk of long‑term cognitive impairment [46,47,48,49,50].

Collectively, these findings support the concept of a multimodal “neuroplasticity lifestyle prescription” that strategically integrates aerobic and resistance exercise, cognitively demanding activities, Mediterranean-style dietary patterns, contemplative stress-reduction practices, and enhance brain function across the aging trajectory [6,32,37].

Neuroplasticity, Metabolic Health, and Brain Longevity

Metabolic health and neuroplasticity are tightly interwoven, with insulin resistance, visceral adiposity, dyslipidemia, and chronic low‑grade inflammation all implicated in impaired brain plasticity and increased risk of dementia. Hippocampal‑specific insulin resistance directly causes reductions in adult neurogenesis, reflected by decreased numbers of immature neurons and reductions in dendritic arborization of CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neurons, supporting the hypothesis that insulin resistance is a common feature associated with structural and functional deficits in patients with metabolic disorders. Visceral adiposity exhibits particularly robust associations with hippocampal dysfunction and cognitive impairment, operating independently of, yet synergistically with, systemic insulin resistance and hyperglycemia. Individuals with visceral obesity exhibit earlier and more frequent cognitive impairment with aging in longitudinal and twin studies, with visceral adipose tissue, rather than subcutaneous fat or body mass index demonstrating significant negative correlations with gray matter volume in the cingulate gyrus and hippocampus [51,52,53,54].

Metabolic dysfunction contributes to endothelial damage, cerebrovascular disease, and disrupted energy supply to neurons, which in turn compromise synaptic maintenance, neurogenesis, and network integrity in vulnerable regions such as the hippocampus. Cerebrovascular endothelial cells activated under metabolic stress conditions demonstrate shared metabolic shifts across ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and Alzheimer’s disease, characterized by downregulation of transporter‑related pathways and reductions in glycolytic intermediates such as pyruvate and fumarate, leading to impaired energy substrate delivery to neurons and compromised blood–brain barrier integrity. Endothelial‑specific insulin resistance increases susceptibility to systemic insulin resistance and impairs glycemic control, while also disrupting neurovascular coupling, the coordinated response between neural activity and cerebral blood flow, thereby linking peripheral metabolic dysfunction to central synaptic plasticity deficits. Conversely, interventions that improve metabolic parameters through diet, physical activity, weight management, and targeted pharmacotherapy have been associated with enhanced cognitive performance and neuroplastic biomarkers in aging populations [51,53,55,56,57,58].

Adaptive metabolic responses such as mild energy restriction, time‑restricted eating, or ketogenic dietary patterns may induce hormetic stress that upregulates cellular stress‑resistance pathways, promotes autophagy, and reduces pro‑aging signalling, thereby favourably influencing neural plasticity. Caloric restriction robustly induces autophagy across multiple metabolic tissues including brain, liver, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and kidney, with autophagy activation being essential for the anti‑aging and longevity‑promoting effects of caloric restriction. Inhibition of autophagy attenuates the beneficial effects of caloric restriction on lifespan extension, protection from hypoxia, and maintenance of organ function under pathological conditions, demonstrating that autophagy represents a necessary mechanistic link between dietary restriction and healthy aging. Ketogenic diets exhibit neuroprotective effects by suppressing glycolysis, promoting production of ketone bodies, enhancing mitochondrial function, reducing expression of inflammatory and apoptotic mediators, and improving insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, with evidence of efficacy in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. These adaptive mechanisms often converge on pathways involving mitochondrial function, redox balance, and neurotrophic signalling, suggesting a shared biological substrate for both metabolic and neural resilience [57,58,59,60,61,62].

Figure 5. Underlying Mechanisms of The Beneficial Impact of Fasting [59]

From a systems perspective, the brain can be conceptualized as a metabolically intensive organ, consuming approximately 25 percent of the body’s available glucose despite representing only 2 percent of total body mass whose plasticity reflects the integrated status of peripheral metabolic networks and lifestyle exposures over decades. Alterations in cerebral glucose metabolism are indicative of both normal and pathological aging processes, with global brain glucose metabolism declining significantly with advancing age, and regional analyses demonstrating glucose hypometabolism particularly in frontal and temporal lobes. The brain’s high metabolic demand renders it especially vulnerable to disruptions in glucose transport, metabolism, and insulin signalling, with impairments in these processes leading to oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased neurotransmitter synthesis, and aberrant synaptic plasticity that ultimately manifest as cognitive deficits. Mitochondrial energy‑transducing capacity is essential for maintenance of neuronal function, and impairment of energy metabolism and redox homeostasis represents a hallmark of brain aging that is particularly accentuated in early stages of neurodegenerative diseases [60,62,63,64,65,66,67].

Integrating continuous or longitudinal metabolic data, such as glucose dynamics measured via continuous glucose monitoring, lipid profiles, body composition indices including visceral adiposity, and inflammatory markers with neurocognitive assessments opens the possibility of defining “metabolic brain age” or “plasticity reserve” as actionable preventive targets. Recent work demonstrates that variability in cerebral glucose metabolism, rather than absolute levels alone, is biologically and functionally relevant to cognition and represents an essential feature of the metabolic connectome, suggesting that dynamic glucose fluctuations may serve as biomarkers of brain health and cognitive resilience. Such metrics could support early identification of individuals at heightened risk of accelerated cognitive aging due to combined metabolic and neuroplastic vulnerabilities, enabling tailored interventions that address both domains simultaneously before irreversible structural damage occurs. In this framework, neuroplasticity is not an isolated brain phenomenon but a downstream expression of whole‑body metabolic health and behavioural context across the lifespan, with interventions targeting peripheral metabolic dysfunction offering tangible neuroprotective benefits that extend cognitive health span [51,63,65,67,68,69].

Emerging Interventions and The Role of AI-enabled Health Tech

Emerging interventions to modulate neuroplasticity now extend beyond lifestyle into domains such as non‑invasive brain stimulation, pharmacotherapy, and digital therapeutics. Techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can transiently alter cortical excitability and facilitate plasticity in targeted networks, especially when combined with task‑specific cognitive or motor training. Parallel early‑stage work is testing agents that modulate neurotrophic signalling, glutamatergic transmission, or neuroinflammation to augment plasticity, although long‑term safety, durability of benefit, and circuit‑level specificity remain open questions [70,71].

AI‑enabled health technologies offer growing potential to personalize and scale these neuroplasticity‑oriented strategies for preventive brain health. By integrating multimodal data such as wearable‑derived activity and sleep measures, cognitive performance, mood trajectories, and metabolic biomarkers. AI models can detect individual vulnerability patterns and treatment responsiveness, informing tailored “plasticity prescriptions” that adapt over time. Digital therapeutics incorporating adaptive cognitive training, emotion‑regulation coaching, and context‑aware behavioural nudges can then deliver high‑frequency, in‑the‑moment interventions that repeatedly engage desired circuits in daily life [72,73].

In aging and longevity practice, AI‑driven decision‑support systems could help clinicians prioritize neuroplasticity‑enhancing interventions with the highest expected benefit for each person, taking into account genetic risk, comorbidities, and environmental constraints. Continuous monitoring of cognitive, behavioural, and physiological outcomes can close the loop between intervention and response, enabling rapid refinement of strategies far earlier than traditional trial‑and‑error care models. As the evidence base evolves, such neuroplasticity‑informed digital ecosystems are poised to become a central pillar of brain longevity programs, translating complex neuroscience into practical, day‑to‑day guidance at population scale [72,73,74].

Conclusion

Neuroplasticity provides a unifying framework for understanding how thought patterns, lifestyle exposures, and metabolic health collectively sculpt the aging brain, either toward resilience or vulnerability. Recurrent negative cognitions such as chronic complaining and rumination exemplify how everyday mental habits can embed stress and negativity into neural architecture, reinforcing threat‑sensitive circuits and amplifying emotional reactivity over time. In contrast, targeted interventions in physical activity, cognitive engagement, diet quality, stress management, and sleep demonstrate the capacity to redirect plasticity toward healthier networks, supporting better mood regulation, preserved cognition, and more robust brain aging.

Within the context of longevity and preventive metabolic care, harnessing neuroplasticity entails moving beyond symptomatic treatment toward proactively shaping brain networks decades before clinical decline becomes apparent. This prevention‑oriented stance emphasizes midlife as a critical window during which modifiable behaviours, metabolic control, and mental habits can substantially alter later‑life trajectories of cognitive function and emotional well‑being. By situating neuroplasticity at the intersection of brain, body, and behaviour, this framework supports integrated strategies that simultaneously address metabolic risk, psychological stress, and cognitive reserve.

Future directions are likely to center on multimodal, personalized strategies that combine neuroplasticity‑supportive behaviours with optimized metabolic regulation, supported by data‑driven systems capable of interpreting longitudinal bio signals and neurocognitive measures. AI‑enabled decision support and digital therapeutics may help deliver adaptive, context‑aware interventions that engage desired neural circuits with sufficient frequency and specificity to produce durable plastic changes in real‑world settings. As the evidence base expands, neuroplasticity can be reframed not only as a fundamental property of the nervous system but as a modifiable lever for extending cognitive health span and emotional stability across the lifespan, with individuals and health systems collaboratively fostering brains that age more slowly and function more robustly in later life.

Reference

  1. Navakkode S, Kennedy BK. Neural ageing and synaptic plasticity: prioritizing brain health in healthy longevity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2024 Aug 5;16.
  2. Wong L, Chong YS, Lin W, Kisiswa L, Sim E, Ibáñez CF, et al. Age‐related changes in hippocampal‐dependent synaptic plasticity and memory mediated by p75 neurotrophin receptor. Aging Cell. 2021 Jan 15;20(2).
  3. Barnes CA. Long-term potentiation and the ageing brain. Bliss TVP, Collingridge GL, Morris RGM, editors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences [Internet]. 2003 Apr 29;358(1432):765–72. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693160/pdf/12740124.pdf
  4. Suzuki F, Makiura Y, Guilhem D, Sørensen JC, Onteniente B. Correlated axonal sprouting and dendritic spine formation during kainate-induced neuronal morphogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. Experimental neurology [Internet]. 1997 May;145(1):203–13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9184122/
  5. Gipson CD, Olive MF. Structural and functional plasticity of dendritic spines – root or result of behavior? Genes, brain, and behavior [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1;16(1):101–17. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5243184/
  6. Marzola P, Melzer T, Pavesi E, Gil-Mohapel J, Brocardo PS. Exploring the role of neuroplasticity in development, aging, and neurodegeneration. Brain Sciences [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):1–32. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/12/1610
  7. Perani D, Farsad M, Ballarini T, Lubian F, Malpetti M, Fracchetti A, et al. The impact of bilingualism on brain reserve and metabolic connectivity in Alzheimer’s dementia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017 Jan 30;114(7):1690–5.
  8. Wellington RL, Bilder RM, Napolitano B, Szeszko PR. Effects of age on prefrontal subregions and hippocampal volumes in young and middle-aged healthy humans. Human Brain Mapping. 2012 Apr 10;34(9):2129–40.
  9. Hill NL, Kolanowski AM, Gill DJ. Plasticity in Early Alzheimer Disease. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2011 Oct;27(4):257–67.
  10. Esiri MM, Chance SA. Cognitive reserve, cortical plasticity and resistance to Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy [Internet]. 2012 Mar 1;4(2):7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334540/
  11. Faraji J, Metz GAS. Harnessing BDNF Signaling to Promote Resilience in Aging. Aging and Disease. 2024 Jan 1;
  12. Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Liu Q, Qiu B. Neuroprotective synergy of vitamin D and exercise: a narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence on aging-related neuroplasticity and cognitive health. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2025 Sep 9;12.
  13. Arazi H, Babaei P, Moghimi M, Asadi A. Acute effects of strength and endurance exercise on serum BDNF and IGF-1 levels in older men. BMC Geriatrics. 2021 Jan 13;21(1).
  14. Radley J, Morilak D, Viau V, Campeau S. Chronic stress and brain plasticity: Mechanisms underlying adaptive and maladaptive changes and implications for stress-related CNS disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2015 Nov;58:79–91.
  15. Sinha R, Lacadie CM, Constable RT, Seo D. Dynamic neural activity during stress signals resilient coping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016 Jul 18;113(31):8837–42.
  16. Deppermann S, Storchak H, Fallgatter AJ, Ehlis AC . Stress-induced neuroplasticity: (Mal)adaptation to adverse life events in patients with PTSD – A critical overview. Neuroscience. 2014 Dec;283:166–77.
  17. McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD. Stress effects on neuronal structure: Hippocampus, amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology [Internet]. 2015 Jun 16;41(1):3–23. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2015171
  18. X (formerly Twitter). 2026 [cited 2026 Jan 20]. Available from: https://x.com/ShiningScience/status/2013113758386987099
  19. Park H, Kuplicki R, Paulus MP, Guinjoan SM. Rumination and Overrecruitment of Cognitive Control Circuits in Depression. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 2024 Aug;9(8):800–8.
  20. Puccetti NA, Stamatis CA, Timpano KR, Heller AS. Worry and rumination elicit similar neural representations: neuroimaging evidence for repetitive negative thinking. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2024 Nov 19;25(2):488–500.
  21. Linz R, Singer T, Engert V. Interactions of momentary thought content and subjective stress predict cortisol fluctuations in a daily life experience sampling study. Scientific Reports. 2018 Oct 18;8(1).
  22. Sultson H, Murd C, Havik M, Konstabel K. Negative affect instability predicts elevated depressive and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms even when negative affect intensity is controlled for: an ecological momentary assessment study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024 Apr 23;15.
  23. Shackman AJ, Tromp DPM, Stockbridge MD, Kaplan CM, Tillman RM, Fox AS. Dispositional negativity: An integrative psychological and neurobiological perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 2016 Dec;142(12):1275–314.
  24. Chesnokova V, Pechnick RN, Wawrowsky K. Chronic peripheral inflammation, hippocampal neurogenesis, and behavior. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity [Internet]. 2016 Nov;58:1–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956598/
  25. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Guo J, Dai W, Chen S, Huang L, et al. Stressors-induced cognitive dysfunction during aging: mechanisms and future challenges. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2025 Oct 22;17.
  26. Opialla S, Lutz J, Scherpiet S, Hittmeyer A, Jäncke L, Rufer M, et al. Neural circuits of emotion regulation: a comparison of mindfulness-based and cognitive reappraisal strategies. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2014 Jun 6;265(1):45–55.
  27. Du W, Liu L. Examining a structural equation model of peace of mind, gratitude, and positive reappraisal in predicting psychological well-being among college students. BMC Psychology. 2025 Sep 29;13(1).
  28. Liu G, Cui Z, Yu H, Rotshtein P, Zhao F, Wang H, et al. Neural responses to intention and benefit appraisal are critical in distinguishing gratitude and joy. Scientific Reports. 2020 May 12;10(1).
  29. Kyeong S, Kim J, Kim DJ, Kim HE, Kim JJ. Effects of gratitude meditation on neural network functional connectivity and brain-heart coupling. Scientific Reports. 2017 Jul 11;7(1).
  30. Bryan JL, Young CM, Lucas S, Quist MC. Should I say thank you? Gratitude encourages cognitive reappraisal and buffers the negative impact of ambivalence over emotional expression on depression. Personality and Individual Differences [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Jan 19];120:253–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311928?via%3Dihub
  31. Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, Basak C, Szabo A, Chaddock L, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [Internet]. 2011 Jan 31;108(7):3017–22. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041121/
  32. Maharjan R, Diaz Bustamante L, Ghattas KN, Ilyas S, Al-Refai R, Khan S. Role of Lifestyle in Neuroplasticity and Neurogenesis in an Aging Brain. Cureus. 2020 Sep 24;
  33. Gholami F, Mesrabadi J, Iranpour M, Donyaei A. Exercise training alters resting brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Experimental gerontology [Internet]. 2025 Jan;199:112658. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39674562/
  34. Tari AR, Walker TL, Huuha AM, Sando SB, Ulrik Wisloff. Neuroprotective mechanisms of exercise and the importance of fitness for healthy brain ageing. The Lancet [Internet]. 2025;405(10484):1093–118. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)00184-9/fulltext
  35. Zhou Z, Wang J, Kong F, Zhang Q. Effect of Baduanjin exercise in a blended online-offline model on cognitive function and peripheral blood BDNF levels in older adults. Frontiers in Physiology. 2025 Jun 18;16.
  36. Romero Garavito A, Díaz Martínez V, Juárez Cortés E, Negrete Díaz JV, Montilla Rodríguez LM. Impact of physical exercise on the regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in people with neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Neurology. 2025 Jan 28;15.
  37. Phillips C. Lifestyle Modulators of Neuroplasticity: How Physical Activity, Mental Engagement, and Diet Promote Cognitive Health during Aging. Neural Plasticity [Internet]. 2017;2017(1):1–22. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2017/3589271/
  38. Berkes M, Bialystok E. Bilingualism as a Contributor to Cognitive Reserve: What it Can do and What it Cannot do. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias®. 2022 Jan;37:153331752210914.
  39. Bialystok E. Bilingualism: Pathway to Cognitive Reserve. Trends in Cognitive Sciences [Internet]. 2021 May;25(5):355–64. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035279/
  40. Franco GA, Interdonato L, Cordaro M, Cuzzocrea S, Di Paola R. Bioactive Compounds of the Mediterranean Diet as Nutritional Support to Fight Neurodegenerative Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1;24(8):7318. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/8/7318?fbclid=IwAR29KMvOxPPb1aOMVtZm4CIdY-EFimW-xam4AMkMg0GCFrYLp-9EiDZO6xc
  41. Exploring the Neuroprotective Power of the MIND & Mediterranean Diets for Alzheimer’s Patients | OmegaQuant [Internet]. OmegaQuant. 2025 [cited 2026 Jan 20]. Available from: https://omegaquant.com/exploring-the-neuroprotective-power-of-the-mind-mediterranean-diets-for-alzheimers-patients/
  42. Picone P, Girgenti A, Buttacavoli M, Nuzzo D. Enriching the Mediterranean diet could nourish the brain more effectively. Frontiers in Nutrition [Internet]. 2024 Nov 27;11. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631615/
  43. Taren AA, Gianaros PJ, Greco CM, Lindsay EK, Fairgrieve A, Brown KW, et al. Mindfulness meditation training alters stress-related amygdala resting state functional connectivity: a randomized controlled trial. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2015 Jun 5;10(12):1758–68.
  44. Chiarpenello C, Brodmann K. What can the psychoneuroimmunology of yoga teach us about depression’s psychopathology? Brain, Behavior, & Immunity – Health [Internet]. 2024 Sep 30;42:100877. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624001558
  45. Gothe NP, Khan I, Hayes J, Erlenbach E, Damoiseaux JS. Yoga Effects on Brain Health: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. Okonkwo O, van Praag H, editors. Brain Plasticity [Internet]. 2019 Dec 26;5(1):105–22. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971819/
  46. Reddy OC, van der Werf YD. The Sleeping Brain: Harnessing the Power of the Glymphatic System through Lifestyle Choices. Brain Sciences [Internet]. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):868. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698404/
  47. Tsapanou A, Scarmeas N, Stern Y. Sleep and the aging brain. A multifaceted approach. Sleep Science [Internet]. 2020;13(2):152–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384533/
  48. Younas A, Sarath Vayolipoyil, Shaheera Raghib, Bano S, Abali Wandala, Khan AA, et al. The Impact of Sleep Deprivation on Brain Fog, Cognitive Decline, and Cardiovascular Risk in Young Adults. Cureus. 2025 May 8;
  49. Voumvourakis KI, Sideri E, Papadimitropoulos GN, Tsantzali I, Hewlett P, Kitsos D, et al. The Dynamic Relationship between the Glymphatic System, Aging, Memory, and Sleep. Biomedicines [Internet]. 2023 Jul 25;11(8):2092. Available from: https://mdpi-res.com/biomedicines/biomedicines-11-02092/article_deploy/biomedicines-11-02092-v2.pdf?version=1690357345
  50. Scientific Reports [Internet]. Scientific Reports. Available from: https://www.nature.com/srep/
  51. Reagan LP, Cowan HB, Woodruff JL, Piroli GG, Erichsen JM, Evans AN, et al. Hippocampal-specific insulin resistance elicits behavioral despair and hippocampal dendritic atrophy. Neurobiology of Stress. 2021 Nov;15:100354.
  52. Dolatshahi M, Commean PK, Nguyen C, Ippolito J, Benzinger TLS, Raji CA. Visceral Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Insulin Resistance Respectively Influence Alzheimer Disease Amyloid Pathology and Neurodegeneration in Midlife. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2023 Dec;19(S17).
  53. Stranahan AM. Visceral adiposity, inflammation, and hippocampal function in obesity. Neuropharmacology. 2022 Mar;205:108920.
  54. Won Jong Chwa, Rahmani F, Mahsa Dolatshahi, Commean PK, Kassani SH, Cai LT, et al. Identifying obesity and dementia risk: body adiposity and neural connectivity in cognitively normal, mid-life adults. PubMed [Internet]. 2025 Sep 16;1(1). Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44400-025-00028-w
  55. Guo G, Fan L, Yan Y, Xu Y, Deng Z, Tian M, et al. Shared metabolic shifts in endothelial cells in stroke and Alzheimer’s disease revealed by integrated analysis. Scientific Data [Internet]. 2023 Sep 29 [cited 2024 Mar 19];10(1):666. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-023-02512-5
  56. Wang F, Cao Y, Ma L, Pei H, Rausch WD, Li H. Dysfunction of Cerebrovascular Endothelial Cells: Prelude to Vascular Dementia. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2018 Nov 16;10.
  57. Chung KW, Chung HY. The Effects of Calorie Restriction on Autophagy: Role on Aging Intervention. Nutrients. 2019 Dec 2;11(12):2923.
  58. Surugiu R, Iancu MA, Ștefănița Bianca Vintilescu, Stepan MD, Daiana Burdusel, Genunche-Dumitrescu AV, et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Healthy Aging: The Role of Caloric Restriction, Intermittent Fasting, Mediterranean Diet, and Ketogenic Diet—A Scoping Review. Nutrients [Internet]. 2024 Aug 28;16(17):2878–8. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/17/2878
  59. Hansen B, Roomp K, Hebah Ebid, Schneider JG. Perspective: The Impact of Fasting and Caloric Restriction on Neurodegenerative Diseases in Humans. Advances in nutrition. 2024 Mar 1;100197–7.
  60. Picard M, McManus MJ, Gray JD, Nasca C, Moffat C, Kopinski PK, et al. Mitochondrial functions modulate neuroendocrine, metabolic, inflammatory, and transcriptional responses to acute psychological stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015 Nov 16;112(48).
  61. Kim Y, Vadodaria KC, Lenkei Z, Kato T, Gage FH, Marchetto MC, et al. Mitochondria, Metabolism, and Redox Mechanisms in Psychiatric Disorders. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2021 Apr 23];31(4):275–317. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602118/
  62. Yin F, Boveris A, Cadenas E. Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism and Redox Signaling in Brain Aging and Neurodegeneration. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2014 Jan 10;20(2):353–71.
  63. Robert Christopher Subtirelu, Eric Michael Teichner, Su Y, Al-Daoud O, Patel M, Patil S, et al. Aging and Cerebral Glucose Metabolism: 18F-FDG-PET/CT Reveals Distinct Global and Regional Metabolic Changes in Healthy Patients. Life (Basel) [Internet]. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):2044–4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608490/
  64. View of Glucose effects on the brain in the healthy and unhealthy individuals: metabolic and cognitive aspects | Research Results in Pharmacology [Internet]. Rrpharmacology.ru. 2025 [cited 2026 Jan 20]. Available from: https://rrpharmacology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/730/650
  65. Zhang S, Zhang Y, Wen Z, Yang Y, Bu T, Bu X, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: abnormal glucose metabolic regulation in the brain. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023 Jun 16;14.
  66. Cacciatore M, Grasso EA, Tripodi R, Chiarelli F. Impact of glucose metabolism on the developing brain. Frontiers in Endocrinology [Internet]. 2022 Dec 23;13. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816389/
  67. Deery HA, Robert Di Paolo, Moran C, Egan GF, Sharna Jamadar. Lower brain glucose metabolism in normal ageing is predominantly frontal and temporal: A systematic review and pooled effect size and activation likelihood estimates meta‐analyses. Human Brain Mapping. 2022 Oct 21;44(3):1251–77.
  68. W HZ, D BE, Jung L, M FL, J SM, S WR, et al. Dynamic associations between glucose and ecological momentary cognition in Type 1 Diabetes. npj Digital Medicine [Internet]. 2024 Mar 18;7(1):1–13. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01036-5
  69. Na D, Zhang Z, Meng M, Li M, Gao J, Kong J, et al. Energy Metabolism and Brain Aging: Strategies to Delay Neuronal Degeneration. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 2025 Apr 21;45(1).
  70. Ben Ezzdine L, Dhahbi W, Dergaa I, Ceylan Hİ, Guelmami N, Ben Saad H, et al. Physical activity and neuroplasticity in neurodegenerative disorders: a comprehensive review of exercise interventions, cognitive training, and AI applications. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2025 Feb 28;19.
  71. Saha R. The Exciting Frontier of Neuroplasticity: Innovations in Brain Health and Recovery. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science. 2025;15(03):47–80.
  72. Martinez O. Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Longevity Landscape [Internet]. Linkedin.com. 2025 [cited 2026 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dr-orvil-martinez-49bb30a7_artificial-intelligence-is-redefining-the-activity-7395534054051303424-EU1D
  73. Cabral DF, Hinchman CA, Nunez C, Rice J, Loewenstein DA, Cahalin LP, et al. Harnessing Neuroplasticity to Promote Brain Health in Aging Adults: Protocol for the MOVE-Cog Intervention Study. JMIR Research Protocols [Internet]. 2021 Nov 23 [cited 2021 Nov 28];10(11):e33589. Available from: https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/11/e33589/PDF
  74. Chaudhari PS, Ermolaeva MA. Too old for healthy aging? Exploring age limits of longevity treatments. npj Metabolic Health and Disease [Internet]. 2024 Dec 12;2(1). Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44324-024-00040-3

Discover more from A1C Almanac

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading