A1C Almanac

Main Page

When Mastery of Movement Meets Mastery of Metabolism

Posted

by

dr Karunia Valeriani Japar

Table of Contents
Category:

Keywords: Metabolic Flexibility, Insulin Sensitivity, Athletic Performance, Recovery Science , Career Longevity

Introduction

Athletic development extends beyond the acquisition of physical capacity, encompassing the cultivation of a professional mindset rooted in metabolic awareness and adaptive discipline. At advanced levels of performance, outcomes are not determined solely by training intensity, but by the integration of physiological regulation, behavioural consistency, and long-term strategic planning. This multidimensional approach reflects a shift from effort-based progression toward system-based optimization.

Central to this paradigm is metabolic mastery, defined as the capacity to efficiently regulate energy utilization, preserve insulin sensitivity, and adapt dynamically to fluctuating physiological demands. Emerging evidence highlights that sustained performance is closely linked to metabolic flexibility, enabling athletes to transition effectively between substrates in response to varying intensities and workloads. Such adaptability not only enhances performance output but also supports recovery and resilience.

Athletes who demonstrate long-term success distinguish themselves not by training volume alone, but by precision in aligning nutritional strategies, recovery protocols, and psychological discipline with their metabolic requirements. This integrated framework allows for sustained adaptation while minimizing the risk of metabolic dysregulation, ultimately forming the foundation of both performance excellence and career longevity.

Long-Term Insulin Management

Insulin functions not only as a central metabolic hormone but also as a key modulator of performance through its effects on substrate availability, recovery, and body composition. Chronic dysregulation of insulin signalling, driven by excessive caloric intake, suboptimal nutrient timing, or frequent glycemic excursions has been associated with impaired metabolic flexibility, increased adiposity, and reduced capacity to switch between carbohydrate and fat oxidation during exercise. In athletic populations, this state of relative metabolic inflexibility can compromise both acute performance and long-term training adaptations by limiting efficient glycogen utilization and fat oxidation [1-4].

For elite athletes, particularly those in endurance and mixed-modal sports, long-term insulin management requires a periodized, “seasonal” approach to carbohydrate intake rather than a fixed macronutrient prescription. During phases of high-intensity training and competition, higher carbohydrate availability supports muscle glycogen replenishment, maintains high rates of carbohydrate oxidation, and sustains performance in efforts relying heavily on glycolytic pathways. In these blocks, post-exercise carbohydrate ingestion in the range of approximately 1–1.2 g·kg⁻¹ body mass per hour has been shown to optimize glycogen resynthesis and prepare the athlete for subsequent sessions, largely via insulin-mediated glucose uptake and glycogen storage. This targeted use of insulin’s anabolic and glycogenic effects is central to supporting repeated high-intensity efforts [2,5]. 

Conversely, during lower-intensity training phases or deliberate aerobic base-building blocks, strategic reduction of carbohydrate intake and a relative increase in fat intake can promote greater reliance on lipid oxidation and enhance insulin sensitivity. Periods of moderately lowered carbohydrate availability, when combined with sufficient training volume, have been associated with improved mitochondrial oxidative capacity and more efficient regulation of carbohydrate and fat metabolism, thereby increasing metabolic flexibility. For athletes, this translates into an enhanced ability to preserve glycogen stores for high-intensity efforts while relying more on fat during submaximal workloads, which supports both performance and long-term metabolic health [1,3,4].

This cyclical or periodized approach to carbohydrate intake, characterized by higher carbohydrate availability during intensive training and competition, and relatively lower intake during lower-intensity or base phases enables athletes to leverage insulin’s acute performance benefits while minimizing the risk of chronic hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Over time, such strategies help preserve insulin sensitivity, support favourable body composition, and maintain the capacity to transition efficiently between fuel sources across varying training demands. In this framework, insulin management is not viewed as a static target but as a dynamic process that must be aligned with the athlete’s training cycle, competitive calendar, and long-term goals for performance and health [1-4].

Training Specificity and Fuel Planning

Effective nutritional periodization requires that fuelling strategies are matched to the specific metabolic demands of each training session rather than applied uniformly across the training week. High-intensity and competition-specific efforts rely predominantly on glycolytic energy pathways and are therefore particularly sensitive to pre-exercise carbohydrate availability and intra-session fuelling. In these contexts, adequate carbohydrate intake in the hours preceding training supports muscle glycogen availability, sustains power output, and reduces perceived exertion, while post-exercise carbohydrate ingestion contributes to glycogen resynthesis and accelerates recovery for subsequent sessions [6-8].

Conversely, low- to moderate-intensity aerobic sessions can be intentionally performed under conditions of reduced carbohydrate availability to promote distinct metabolic adaptations. Commencing selected training bouts with lower muscle glycogen has been shown to augment markers of mitochondrial biogenesis and increase the activity of oxidative enzymes, thereby enhancing the capacity for fat oxidation and improving metabolic flexibility. This “train low” strategy is typically implemented for a portion of weekly sessions, while ensuring that key high-intensity or performance-specific workouts are undertaken with high carbohydrate availability to preserve absolute training quality and competition readiness (“compete high”) [9].

This “training low, competing high” paradigm reflects a nuanced approach to metabolic conditioning, in which fuel timing and carbohydrate availability are manipulated as deliberate training variables rather than viewed solely as sources of energy. When appropriately periodized, such strategies allow athletes to simultaneously maximize adaptive signalling from low-glycogen sessions and maintain peak performance during race-specific work, thereby integrating nutritional planning into the broader framework of training specificity and long-term performance development [6,8].

Advanced Metabolic Conditioning

Zone-based training frameworks, with particular emphasis on Zone 2 aerobic work, have emerged as a central strategy for improving metabolic efficiency and long-term performance capacity in athletes. Training at Zone 2 intensity, typically corresponding to a moderate, sustainable workload where oxygen delivery matches demand, preferentially stresses the aerobic system and promotes a high rate of fat oxidation while preserving glycogen stores. Repeated exposure to this intensity is associated with increased mitochondrial content and function, enhanced capillary density, and more efficient handling of metabolic by-products, all of which contribute to improved endurance and metabolic health [10-14]. 

At the cellular level, Zone 2 training stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and improves mitochondrial oxidative capacity, thereby increasing the muscle’s ability to utilize fatty acids as a primary fuel source during submaximal exercise. These adaptations are accompanied by increased expression of glucose transporters (such as GLUT4) and improved insulin sensitivity, facilitating more efficient glucose uptake into skeletal muscle with reduced reliance on high circulating insulin levels. Over time, this combination of enhanced fat oxidation and improved glucose handling underpins greater metabolic flexibility, defined as the capacity to switch effectively between carbohydrate and fat substrates in response to changing energetic demands [10,13,15].

From a performance perspective, improved metabolic flexibility translates into the ability to sustain higher workloads for longer durations, delay the onset of fatigue, and preserve glycogen for decisive high-intensity efforts such as surges, sprints, or repeated power outputs. By increasing the contribution of fat to energy production at moderate intensities, Zone 2 training reduces lactate accumulation and lowers the overall physiological stress of a given workload, supporting more consistent training volumes and faster between-session recovery. These adaptations are particularly valuable in sports requiring prolonged efforts, but they also benefit athletes in strength and hybrid disciplines by improving phosphocreatine resynthesis, waste metabolite clearance, and overall work capacity between high-intensity bouts [12,18].

Importantly, the benefits of advanced metabolic conditioning are not confined to traditional endurance athletes. Resistance and mixed-modal training programs that incorporate aerobic conditioning at Zone 2 intensity demonstrate improvements in lipid oxidation, cardiometabolic health, and training economy, which can enhance performance even in sports characterized predominantly by short, intense efforts. When integrated into a broader periodized program, Zone 2 and other forms of aerobic conditioning thus serve as foundational tools for building a robust metabolic “engine,” supporting both peak performance and long-term health across diverse sporting disciplines [10,13,18].

Recovery Science

Recovery is the phase in which the acute stress of training is translated into durable metabolic and structural adaptations, making it a central determinant of long-term performance and health in athletes. Post-exercise nutritional strategies that prioritize adequate protein intake, sufficient energy, and appropriate carbohydrate replacement support muscle protein remodeling, glycogen resynthesis, and restoration of homeostasis. Contemporary evidence suggests that distributing high-quality protein across the day, with particular attention to the early post-exercise window, enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis and facilitates both functional recovery and training adaptation in endurance and strength athletes. Alongside macronutrients, micronutrients such as magnesium, vitamin D, and antioxidant compounds act as essential cofactors in energy metabolism, redox balance, and tissue repair, and insufficiency may impair performance and slow recovery [2,29,30]. 

From a metabolic health perspective, recovery nutrition must also consider insulin dynamics. Re-introducing carbohydrates in a controlled, context-specific manner, taking into account training load, glycogen depletion, and overall energy balance, supports glycogen restoration while mitigating excessive post-prandial glycemic excursions that could, over time, compromise insulin sensitivity. Frameworks such as the “4R’s” (Rehydrate, Refuel, Repair, Rest) highlight the need to balance carbohydrate intake for refuelling with adequate protein for tissue repair and appropriate fluid and electrolyte replacement to restore volume status, particularly when recovery windows between sessions are short. This integrated approach helps maintain insulin balance, attenuate post-exercise inflammation, and preserve metabolic flexibility across the training cycle [2,30].

Sleep and rest are equally critical components of recovery science and exert powerful effects on glucose metabolism and endocrine regulation. Experimental and epidemiological data demonstrate that sleep restriction or poor-quality sleep can reduce insulin sensitivity, disrupt glucose tolerance, and alter autonomic balance, thereby increasing cardiometabolic risk even in otherwise healthy individuals. Inadequate or fragmented sleep is also associated with elevated evening cortisol and altered circadian regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, which may further promote insulin resistance, impair muscle recovery, and negatively affect performance and cognitive function. For athletes, structured rest days, consistent sleep timing, and targeted sleep hygiene practices, such as minimizing circadian misalignment, controlling light exposure, and avoiding late-evening heavy meals or stimulants are therefore essential to support recovery, maintain insulin sensitivity, and optimize adaptation to training [31,32].

Psychological Discipline

Psychological discipline in sport is increasingly conceptualized as a form of self-regulation,  encompassing the capacity to monitor, direct, and adjust thoughts, emotions, and behaviours in service of long-term performance goals rather than immediate comfort or gratification. In high-performance settings, this includes the ability to maintain training consistency, adhere to individualized nutritional plans, and sustain effort under fatigue or pressure, even when motivational states fluctuate. Elite coaches and athletes frequently identify self-regulatory skill as a core determinant of success, highlighting that technical and physical talent must be supported by deliberate psychological control for performance potential to be fully realized [33].

A central expression of psychological discipline in athletes is adherence to intentional, and often restrictive-appearing, nutrition strategies around competition and key training phases. Qualitative and quantitative work on nutrition behaviours in elite performers shows that dietary adherence is shaped not only by knowledge but also by intentions, perceived behavioural control, and social norms within the sporting environment. In this context, “controlled eating” is better understood as goal-directed regulation, aligning food choices with performance and recovery objectives rather than as deprivation per se. Athletes must continuously navigate social occasions, environmental food cues, travel constraints, and emotional responses (e.g., stress, anxiety) while preserving alignment with pre-planned nutritional strategies, which places substantial demands on self-control and planning capacity [34,35,36].

The ability to delay gratification, sacrificing immediate preferences (such as comfort, leisure, or palatable but non-optimal foods) for future competitive benefits represents another key facet of psychological discipline. Broader self-control literature links delayed gratification with improved health behaviours, greater persistence, and better long-term outcomes, suggesting clear relevance to the sustained demands of high-level sport. Self-control in athletes is conceptualized within models such as the strength model of self-control, which posits that acts of regulation (e.g., adhering to training when fatigued, resisting non-plan foods) draw upon a limited resource that can become temporarily depleted, thereby impairing subsequent performance and decision-making if not managed appropriately. This has direct implications for training and competition preparation, as excessive concurrent self-control demands (e.g., strict dieting, heavy training load, life stress) may increase the risk of lapses, overreaching, or maladaptive behaviours if recovery of psychological resources is not prioritized [37,38].

Importantly, this level of discipline is not considered innate but rather a trainable set of skills that develop over time through targeted practice and exposure. Longitudinal and intervention studies indicate that self-regulation capacities can be enhanced through structured psychological skills training, biofeedback, goal-setting, self-monitoring, and reflective practice, leading to improved resilience and stress coping in elite athletes. Conceptual models of self-regulation in sport emphasize iterative cycles of forethought (goal setting and planning), performance control (attentional focus, emotion regulation, behavioural execution), and self-reflection (evaluation and adjustment), which gradually refine athletes’ ability to stay aligned with long-term objectives despite fluctuating internal states and external demands. Within this framework, psychological discipline emerges as a learned, adaptive capacity that underpins consistent training, nutritional adherence, and strategic decision-making across an athlete’s career [37].

Career Longevity

Career longevity in sport increasingly appears to depend on the preservation of metabolic health, rather than on musculoskeletal integrity alone. While elite and former athletes generally demonstrate lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than the general population, long-term follow-up data also show that this survival advantage is not uniform and may be attenuated in those with higher injury burden, adverse body composition changes, or deteriorating cardiometabolic profiles over time. Metabolic inflexibility, characterized by impaired switching between lipid and carbohydrate oxidation, has been linked to insulin resistance, ectopic lipid accumulation, and activation of pro-inflammatory pathways that can promote both systemic disease and impaired muscle function. In the context of sport, chronic low-grade inflammation, suboptimal recovery, and reduced oxidative capacity may increase susceptibility to overuse injuries, delay healing after tissue damage, and amplify performance decline with advancing age [39-43] .

Maintaining insulin sensitivity, optimizing body composition, and supporting efficient energy utilization therefore become core strategies for extending an athlete’s competitive lifespan. Regular, appropriately dosed physical activity improves skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity, supports favourable lipid handling, and enhances mitochondrial function, helping to maintain metabolic flexibility into later life. Longitudinal work suggests that endurance and team-sport athletes who sustain higher levels of physical activity after their peak competitive years preserve leaner body composition, higher aerobic capacity, and better cardiometabolic indicators than both non-athlete controls and former athletes who become sedentary. Conversely, when serious musculoskeletal injury is combined with inactivity and energy-dense diets, limitations in metabolic plasticity can emerge, including impaired fatty acid oxidation, lipid accumulation within muscle, and reduced metabolic rate changes that may predispose to both functional decline and metabolic disease [1,39,41,42,44].

Within this framework, longevity in sport is conceptualized not merely as the absence of injury, but as the preservation of physiological reserve and adaptability over decades. Athletes who manage training load intelligently, periodize high-intensity work, and integrate adequate recovery while maintaining metabolic health appear better positioned to extend high-level performance and mitigate the late-career burden of cardiometabolic disease. Strategic attention to insulin sensitivity (through training and nutrition), body composition, and oxidative capacity thus underpins a model of “athletic aging” in which competitive years may be prolonged and post-career health trajectories improved, rather than sacrificed, by a life in sport [16,39,41,44].

Conclusion

The progression toward athletic excellence represents an integrative process in which physical training, metabolic regulation, and psychological discipline operate in concert. Performance is no longer defined solely by mechanical output or training load, but by the capacity to harmonize these domains within a structured and sustainable framework. This integration underscores the necessity of approaching athletic development as a systems-based endeavour rather than an isolated pursuit of physical adaptation.

Within this context, mastery of movement must be paralleled by mastery of metabolism. The ability to regulate energy availability, maintain insulin sensitivity, and adapt to varying physiological demands constitutes a critical determinant of both performance and recovery. As contemporary sport increasingly adopts data-driven and personalized approaches, athletes are required to develop a deeper understanding of their own metabolic responses and individual variability.

Ultimately, professionalism in athletics extends beyond competitive outcomes, encompassing the consistent application of strategies that optimize internal physiology. Long-term success is achieved not only through peak performance, but through the sustained capacity to preserve metabolic health, enhance resilience, and support ongoing adaptation. This daily commitment to internal optimization defines the modern athlete and underpins both performance excellence and career longevity.

Reference

  1. Shoemaker ME, Gillen ZM, Fukuda DH, Cramer JT. Metabolic Flexibility and Inflexibility: Pathology Underlying Metabolism Dysfunction. Journal of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Jul 3;12(13):4453–3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342527/
  2. Naderi A, Gobbi N, Ali A, Berjisian E, Hamidvand A, Forbes SC, et al. Carbohydrates and Endurance Exercise: A Narrative Review of a Food First Approach. Nutrients [Internet]. 2023 Mar 11;15(6):1367. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/6/1367
  3. Cabrera DD, Castro M, Lemos LA, Matta AJ, Ríos DCZ. Carbohydrates in sports performance. International Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine [Internet]. 2025;18(4):148–54. Available from: https://medcraveonline.com/IJCAM/IJCAM-18-00741.pdf
  4. MADRAZO A. Metabolic Flexibility: Why It’s the Ultimate Performance Advantage [Internet]. BRUTAL SALTY ENERGY. 2025 [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://brutalsaltyenergy.com/blogs/science/metabolic-flexibility-why-its-the-ultimate-performance-advantage
  5. Metabolic Flexibility and Performance Part 2/2 [Internet]. Umarasports.com. 2025 [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://umarasports.com/en-FR/metabolic-flexibility-and-performance-part-22
  6. Bytomski JR. Fueling for Performance. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2017;10(1):47–53.
  7. Peele L. Do I Need to Worry About Carbohydrate Timing? [Internet]. MacroFactor. 2024. Available from: https://macrofactor.com/carbohydrate-timing/
  8. Manipulating Carbohydrate Availability to Promote Training Adaptation [Internet]. Gatorade Sports Science Institute. 2014. Available from: https://www.gssiweb.org/sports-science-exchange/article/sse-134-manipulating-carbohydrate-availability-to-promote-training-adaptation
  9. Weiss A, Alack K, Klatt S, Zukunft S, Schermuly R, Frech T, et al. Sustained Endurance Training Leads to Metabolomic Adaptation. Metabolites. 2022 Jul 16;12(7):658.
  10. Zone 2 Training Benefits: The Complete Guide to Metabolic Health and Performance [Internet]. Banner Peak Health. 2025. Available from: https://bannerpeakhealth.com/zone-2-training-benefits/
  11. Vossen L. Zone 2 Training: Benefits, Science, and How-To Guide [Internet]. INSCYD. 2023. Available from: https://inscyd.com/article/zone2-training/
  12. Zone 2 Training For Endurance Athletes: Build Your Aerobic Capacity [Internet]. TrainingPeaks. 2014. Available from: https://www.trainingpeaks.com/blog/zone-2-training-for-endurance-athletes/
  13. Zone 2 Cardio Training: The Sustainable Path to Metabolic Health and Longevity – Klarity Health Library [Internet]. Klarity Health Library. 2026 [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://my.klarity.health/zone-2-cardio-training-the-sustainable-path-to-metabolic-health-and-longevityabc/
  14. Presto G. The metabolic benefits of slow, steady Zone 2 exercise [Internet]. Levels. 2022. Available from: https://www.levels.com/blog/the-metabolic-benefits-of-slow-steady-zone-2-exercise
  15. The. Shepherd Wellness [Internet]. Shepherd Wellness. 2025 [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.drshepherdwellness.com/blog/zone-2-exercise-and-resistance-training-for-metabolic-health
  16. Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. Metabolic Flexibility and Its Impact on Health Outcomes. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2022 Mar;97(4):761–76.
  17. Battaglia GM, Zheng D, Hickner RC, Houmard JA. Effect of exercise training on metabolic flexibility in response to a high-fat diet in obese individuals. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2012 Dec 15;303(12):E1440–5.
  18. Tongwu Y, Chuanwei D. The effectiveness of metabolic resistance training versus traditional cardio on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 2025 Mar 20;16.
  19. Burke LM. Fueling strategies to optimize performance: training high or training low? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2010 Sep 14;20(2):48–58.
  20. Impey SG, Hearris MA, Hammond KM, Bartlett JD, Louis J, Close GL, et al. Fuel for the Work Required: A Theoretical Framework for Carbohydrate Periodization and the Glycogen Threshold Hypothesis. Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2018 Feb 16;48(5):1031–48. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29453741/
  21. Forbes SC, Candow DG, Smith-Ryan AE, Hirsch KR, Roberts MD, VanDusseldorp TA, et al. Supplements and Nutritional Interventions to Augment High-Intensity Interval Training Physiological and Performance Adaptations—A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020 Jan 31;12(2):390.
  22. A Periodized Approach to Carbohydrate Intake During Training and Racing [Internet]. http://www.trainingpeaks.com. Available from: https://www.trainingpeaks.com/blog/carbohydrate-intake-training-racing/
  23. Mackenzie B. Train Low, Compete High [Internet]. Brianmac.co.uk. 2014. Available from: https://www.brianmac.co.uk/articles/article359.htm
  24. Galgani JE, Johannsen NM, Bajpeyi S, Costford SR, Zhang Z, Gupta AK, et al. Role of Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Density on Exercise-Stimulated Lipid Oxidation. Obesity. 2012 Jul;20(7):1387–93.
  25. Yoshida Y, Jain SS, McFarlan JT, Snook LA, Chabowski A, Bonen A. Exercise- and training-induced upregulation of skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation are not solely dependent on mitochondrial machinery and biogenesis. The Journal of Physiology. 2012 Nov 21;591(18):4415–26.
  26. Villarroel López P, Juárez Santos-García D. High Intensity Functional Training in Hybrid Competitions: A Scoping Review of Performance Models and Physiological Adaptations. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology [Internet]. 2025 Sep 24;10(4):365. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/10/4/365
  27. The. Shepherd Wellness [Internet]. Shepherd Wellness. 2025. Available from: https://www.drshepherdwellness.com/blog/zone-2-exercise-and-resistance-training-for-metabolic-health
  28. Witard OC, Hearris M, Morgan PT. Protein Nutrition for Endurance Athletes: A Metabolic Focus on Promoting Recovery and Training Adaptation. Sports Medicine. 2025 Mar 21;
  29. Lively C. Optimizing Athletic Recovery: The Role of Nutrition and Supplements in Combatting Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage [Internet]. JSU Digital Commons. 2024 [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/ce_jsustudentsymp_2024/47/
  30. Welcome To Zscaler Directory Authentication [Internet]. Nih.gov. 2024. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7796021/
  31. González-Ortiz M;Martínez-Abundis E;Balcázar-Muñoz BR;Pascoe-González S. Effect of sleep deprivation on insulin sensitivity and cortisol concentration in healthy subjects. Diabetes, nutrition & metabolism [Internet]. 2021;13(2). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10898125/
  32. O’Byrne NA, Yuen F, Butt WZ, Liu PY. Sleep and circadian regulation of cortisol: A short review. Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1;18(18):178–86. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451965021000363?via%3Dihub
  33. Kitsantas A, Kavussanu M, Corbatto D, Van De Pol. Self-regulation in sports learning and performance [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/43378404/Kitsantas_et_al_IN_PRINT_2017.pdf
  34. LAB S. SEWP LAB [Internet]. SEWP LAB. 2019 [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.sewplab.com/selfregulation
  35. Self-Regulation in Sport – IResearchNet [Internet]. Psychology. 2016. Available from: https://psychology.iresearchnet.com/sports-psychology/psychological-skills/self-regulation-in-sport/
  36. Bentley M, Patterson L, Mitchell N, Backhouse S. Athlete perspectives on the enablers and barriers to nutritional adherence in high-performance sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1;52(101831):101831. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029220308165
  37. Balk YA, Englert C. Recovery self-regulation in sport: Theory, research, and practice. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2020 Jan 13;15(2):174795411989752.
  38. Englert C. The Strength Model of Self-Control in Sport and Exercise Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 Mar 2;7.
  39. Runacres A, Mackintosh KA, McNarry MA. Health Consequences of an Elite Sporting Career: Long-Term Detriment or Long-Term Gain? A Meta-Analysis of 165,000 Former Athletes. Sports Medicine. 2020 Dec 24;51(2):289–301.
  40. Fernández-Verdejo R, Gutiérrez-Pino J, Hayes-Ortiz T, Hermann Zbinden-Foncea, Cabello-Verrugio C, Mayalen Valero-Breton, et al. Metabolic flexibility to lipid during exercise is not associated with metabolic health outcomes in individuals without obesity. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2024 Nov 19;14(1). Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-79092-w
  41. Jena Heck Street, Boos ZP, Fial A, Lennon SL, Smith CS, Creasy SA, et al. Long-term function, body composition and cardiometabolic health in midlife former athletes: a scoping review. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1;9(4):e001605–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619025/
  42. Bruzina AS, Raymond-Pope CJ, Murray KJ, Lillquist TJ, Castelli KM, Bijwadia SR, et al. Limitations in metabolic plasticity after traumatic injury are only moderately exacerbated by physical activity restriction. npj Metabolic Health and Disease. 2024 Apr 6;2(1).
  43. Shoemaker ME, Gillen ZM, Fukuda DH, Cramer JT. Metabolic Flexibility and Inflexibility: Pathology Underlying Metabolism Dysfunction. Journal of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Jul 3;12(13):4453–3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342527/
  44. Bird SR, Hawley JA. Update on the Effects of Physical Activity on Insulin Sensitivity in Humans. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine [Internet]. 2017;2(1):e000143. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569266/

Discover more from A1C Almanac

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading