Keywords: Metabolic Balance, Health Span , Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Flexibility, Lifestyle Intervention
Redefining Longevity: From lifespan to Health Span
The modern conception of longevity has shifted decisively from “more years” to “better years.” Living to 90 or 100 is no longer extraordinary; what remains rare is reaching those decades with intact mobility, cognitive sharpness, and metabolic vigor. Contemporary geroscience now distinguishes lifespan, the chronological duration of life, from health span, the period during which an individual remains functionally well. It is health span, not lifespan, that resonates most deeply with patients, clinicians, and policymakers, and it is health span that an integrated wellness strategy can most directly influence [1,2,11].
A growing body of evidence places metabolic stability at the center of this distinction. Stable insulin signalling, efficient mitochondrial energetics, and resilient cellular repair pathways are increasingly recognized as the upstream drivers of how, and how well, humans age. When these systems are well regulated, virtually every downstream system benefits: cardiovascular reserve is preserved, cognition remains sharp, lean tissue is maintained, and the chronic inflammation that fuels age-related disease is suppressed [4,9,28].
In contrast, chronic metabolic dysregulation, particularly persistent hyperinsulinemia, accelerates the very processes that define biological aging: oxidative stress, glycation, mitochondrial decline, and low-grade inflammation. Hyperinsulinemia frequently precedes overt type 2 diabetes by a decade or more and has been implicated in cardiovascular disease, neurodegeneration, and several cancers. Recognizing and reversing this trajectory before it becomes pathological is, therefore, a central project of contemporary preventive medicine and a major opportunity for AI-enabled health technologies [5-9].
This article frames longevity not as a contest of restriction or biohacking but as an integrated practice of metabolic stewardship. Drawing on contemporary geroscience, endocrinology, exercise physiology, and behavioural medicine, it explores how individuals can cultivate the cellular and systemic conditions that allow them to live longer and thrive. The sections that follow examine how insulin regulation, metabolic flexibility, exercise, hormonal balance, sleep, sunlight, hydration, stress management, and social connection compound over time to extend health span. They also outline the practical biomarkers that clinicians, researchers, and informed individuals can use to monitor biological, rather than chronological, age. The unifying message is that vitality in later decades is largely earned through the consistent, evidence-based habits practiced in the earlier ones, and that small, sustained inputs produce disproportionately large biological returns over time.
The Biology of Aging: Insulin, Inflammation, and the Cellular Clock
Aging is not a single event but a network of interrelated cellular processes that together determine how rapidly the organism deteriorates. Contemporary geroscience identifies twelve interrelated “hallmarks of aging,” among them genomic instability, mitochondrial dysfunction, deregulated nutrient sensing, cellular senescence, and chronic inflammation. While each hallmark deserves attention, deregulated nutrient sensing, and specifically chronic insulin elevation, occupies a uniquely upstream position because it modulates many of the others [1,2,4].
Insulin is the body’s principal anabolic hormone, instructing cells when to take up glucose, build proteins, and store fat. Acute, transient elevations in insulin are physiologic and necessary. Chronic elevation, however, is corrosive. Persistent hyperinsulinemia drives systemic inflammation, increases reactive oxygen species, suppresses autophagy (the cellular self-cleaning that clears damaged proteins and organelles), and accelerates the accumulation of senescent cells that secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines. Over decades, these effects manifest as the recognizable clinical phenotype of advanced aging: visceral adiposity, cognitive decline, vascular stiffness, and sarcopenia [5-9,28].
Mitochondria, the energy-producing organelles in every cell, are particularly vulnerable. Under chronic insulin signalling and constant glucose availability, mitochondrial biogenesis falters and the membranes themselves become less efficient at burning fat and generating ATP . The metabolic consequence is fatigue and weight gain; the cellular consequence is increased free-radical leakage that damages DNA, lipids, and protein. Restoring controlled insulin levels, in contrast, allows mitochondrial density to recover, autophagy to proceed, and the inflammatory tone of tissues to settle [11-14].
Equally important is the concept of “inflammaging,” the chronic, sterile, low-grade inflammation that accompanies advancing age and links metabolic dysfunction with virtually every age-related disease. Insulin resistance and inflammaging are now understood as two faces of the same physiology: each amplifies the other in a self-reinforcing loop. Breaking that loop, through dietary moderation, regular exercise, restorative sleep, and stress management, is the most actionable lever the average individual can pull to slow biological aging [4,8,28].
Importantly, the cellular damage of chronic hyperinsulinemia is not destiny. Studies of caloric restriction, intermittent fasting, and exercise demonstrate that aged tissues retain remarkable plasticity well into the seventh and eighth decades. Insulin sensitivity can be restored, mitochondrial density can be increased, and the inflammatory tone of the body can be lowered through deliberate, sustained behaviour change. The cellular clock, in other words, is not fixed. It responds, often quickly, to how the body is fuelled, used, and rested [11,14,21].
Metabolic Flexibility as Youth Maintenance: Fueling Resilience Through Adaptive Energy Use
Metabolic flexibility, the capacity to switch efficiently between burning carbohydrate and burning fat in response to fuel availability, is a hallmark of metabolic youth. A flexible system rapidly oxidizes glucose after a meal, then transitions smoothly to fatty acid oxidation between meals or during prolonged exertion. This adaptability supports stable energy throughout the day, prevents the postprandial crashes associated with refined-carbohydrate diets, and preserves the metabolic reserves needed for cellular repair processes such as autophagy [12-14].
The opposite of metabolic flexibility is metabolic rigidity, in which cells become locked into glucose dependence and cannot easily mobilize fat for fuel. This rigidity is a defining feature of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and it correlates with decreased mitochondrial number and quality. Importantly, metabolic flexibility can be cultivated, and two of the most powerful and well-studied interventions are time-restricted eating (a form of intermittent fasting) and a low-glycemic dietary pattern [13].
Time-restricted eating compresses daily food intake into a 6- to 10-hour window, allowing the remaining 14 to 18 hours to function as a fasting period. During the fast, insulin levels fall, glycogen stores deplete, and the body begins burning fatty acids and producing ketones. This metabolic switch, sometimes called the “intermittent metabolic switch,” appears to trigger broad cellular benefits, including upregulated autophagy, enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis, and improved insulin sensitivity . Randomized controlled trials and large observational studies demonstrate improvements in glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, and inflammatory markers, often independent of total caloric restriction [14,15,44].
Low-glycemic eating patterns complement intermittent fasting by minimizing the magnitude and duration of postprandial insulin surges. Foods that produce sustained, modest glucose responses, such as non-starchy vegetables, legumes, intact whole grains, nuts, fish, and quality proteins, keep insulin levels in a healthy range and avoid the repeated stimulation that, over decades, drives hyperinsulinemia. International scientific consensus statements have endorsed glycemic load as a clinically meaningful dietary metric for chronic disease prevention [6-17].
The convergence of timing (when to eat) and composition (what to eat) is where metabolic flexibility is built. Regular periods of low insulin signalling teach the body to access stored fat efficiently, while moderating glycemic load prevents the chronic insulin elevation that erodes that capacity. Together, these strategies extend health span not by deprivation but by restoring the rhythmic, adaptive metabolism that characterized human biology long before continuous food availability and ultra processed nutrition [11,15,44].
For most people, the practical translation is straightforward: eat real food, prefer minimally processed sources of carbohydrate, eat within a defined window, and allow at least 12 hours overnight without caloric intake. Over years, these unremarkable habits compound into substantial metabolic resilience and biologically younger tissues.
Exercise for Longevity: Strength, Mobility, and Cardiometabolic Reserve
Exercise is the single most studied non-pharmacologic intervention in geroscience, and its effects on health span are unambiguous. The contemporary view is that physical activity is not optional. It is a fundamental input the human body requires to maintain its tissues, hormones, and cognition. The most useful framework for longevity-oriented exercise prescribes three pillars: cardiovascular conditioning, resistance training, and balance and mobility work [18,23].
Cardiovascular conditioning, steady-state aerobic activity supplemented with periodic high-intensity intervals, develops cardiorespiratory fitness, often quantified as VO2 max. VO2 max is among the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality known to medicine. A landmark 2018 cohort study of more than 122,000 adults found that elite-level cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a roughly five-fold reduction in long-term mortality compared with low fitness, a benefit greater than that of not smoking or not having diabetes. Even modest gains in fitness produce meaningful mortality benefits, particularly among previously sedentary adults [18,23,40].
Resistance training, lifting weights, performing bodyweight exercises, or using resistance bands, directly counteracts sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. Sarcopenia is not a cosmetic concern; it is associated with falls, fractures, hospitalization, and loss of independence [19,38]. Beyond preserving lean mass, resistance training is a potent insulin-sensitizing intervention. Skeletal muscle is the body’s largest sink for postprandial glucose, and contracting muscle takes up glucose via insulin-independent pathways. Two to four sessions per week of progressive resistance training improve insulin sensitivity, glycemic control, bone mineral density, and resting metabolic rate, and are associated with reduced all-cause mortality independent of aerobic activity [19-22,32,38].
Grip strength, a simple proxy for total-body strength, has emerged as a biomarker of biological aging in its own right. The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study of nearly 140,000 adults across 17 countries found that each 5-kg decrement in grip strength was associated with a 16% increase in all-cause mortality and significant increases in cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Grip strength frequently outperforms blood pressure and cholesterol as a mortality predictor in older adults [38,39].
Balance and mobility training, often the neglected pillar, becomes increasingly important after the fifth decade. Falls are the leading cause of injury-related death in adults over 65, and the underlying culprit is typically a combination of declining proprioception, reduced lower-extremity strength, and impaired vestibular function. Practices such as single-leg work, controlled mobility flows, tai chi, and yoga maintain the neuromuscular coordination required to prevent falls and preserve independent living [18].
Crucially, exercise is also a potent endocrine stimulus. Resistance training transiently raises growth hormone and testosterone, while regular activity moderates cortisol and improves leptin signalling . Over time, these effects translate to better mood, sharper cognition, and reduced systemic inflammation. The most important threshold appears to be the transition from sedentary to lightly active; subsequent gains accrue with greater volume and intensity, but the largest single mortality benefit comes simply from moving regularly throughout life [18,23-25,28,40].
Hormone and Inflammation Regulation: The Endocrine Symphony of Aging Well
Hormones do not act in isolation. Insulin, cortisol, leptin, growth hormone, and the sex steroids form an interconnected regulatory network, and disturbance in one node ripples through the others. Understanding aging as the disruption of this endocrine symphony reframes many disparate symptoms, sleep disturbance, weight gain, mood changes, cognitive fog, as manifestations of a single underlying problem: hormonal dysregulation rooted in metabolic instability [25-27].
Insulin is the conductor of this orchestra. Stable insulin signalling supports normal cortisol rhythms, healthy leptin sensitivity (and therefore appetite regulation), and adequate nocturnal pulses of growth hormone that drive tissue repair. When insulin is chronically elevated, cortisol rhythms flatten, leptin signalling becomes blunted, and growth hormone secretion is suppressed. The result is a body that struggles to repair itself overnight, perceives constant hunger despite adequate energy stores, and remains in a low-level fight-or-flight state during the day [4,25-27].
Cortisol, the body’s primary glucocorticoid, follows a diurnal pattern that peaks in the morning and falls in the evening. Chronic stress, poor sleep, and metabolic dysfunction blunt this rhythm, producing flattened curves associated with abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, depression, and cardiovascular risk . Conversely, regular exercise, sleep regularity, and time outdoors restore the diurnal pattern and improve resilience to acute stressors [25,28].
Leptin, secreted by adipose tissue, communicates energy availability to the hypothalamus and modulates appetite, thyroid function, and reproductive hormones. In states of chronic caloric excess and hyperinsulinemia, the hypothalamus becomes leptin-resistant, mistakenly signalling starvation despite ample energy stores. This drives further overeating and weight gain in a vicious cycle. Restoring insulin sensitivity through dietary moderation and exercise is the most reliable means of restoring leptin signalling [12,26].
Growth hormone secretion peaks during deep slow-wave sleep and is essential for tissue repair, lean mass maintenance, and fat oxidation. Its age-related decline, sometimes called somatopause, contributes to sarcopenia and central adiposity. Notably, growth hormone secretion is suppressed by hyperinsulinemia and stimulated by deep sleep, exercise, and intermittent fasting, reinforcing the integrative nature of these interventions [14,27].
Underlying all of this is inflammation. Chronic, low-grade systemic inflammation, inflammaging, is now recognized as a unifying pathology of aging that links metabolic, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and immune dysfunction. The drivers are familiar: visceral adiposity, sedentary behaviours, poor sleep, ultra processed diets, social isolation, and persistent psychological stress. The interventions that lower inflammation are equally familiar, and identical to those that improve insulin sensitivity. This convergence is not coincidence: metabolic and inflammatory regulation share many of the same molecular pathways, and improvements in one domain typically produce improvements in the other [4,28].
Protecting the brain, the heart, and the joints from age-related decline therefore requires not a single magic bullet but the maintenance of overall hormonal coherence. The cumulative effect of stable insulin, healthy cortisol rhythms, restored leptin signalling, robust growth hormone pulses, and a low inflammatory tone is an organism better able to repair itself, sleep deeply, think clearly, and recover from the inevitable challenges of life [4,28,42].
Lifestyle Synergy: Sleep, Sun, and the Compound Interest of Daily Habits
No single behaviours produces longevity. What produces longevity is the compounding effect of many ordinary habits practiced consistently over years and decades. The most powerful of these are unglamorous: sleeping well, getting regular sun exposure, drinking enough water, managing stress thoughtfully, and remaining socially connected [10,29,30,31,33-35].
Sleep is foundational. The contemporary literature is unambiguous that habitually sleeping less than seven hours, or sleeping with disrupted architecture, increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, depression, dementia, and all-cause mortality . Deep slow-wave sleep is when growth hormone is secreted, glymphatic clearance of metabolic waste from the brain occurs, and emotional consolidation takes place; rapid-eye-movement sleep supports memory and cognitive flexibility. Sleep deprivation acutely induces insulin resistance: even a single night of restricted sleep reduces glucose tolerance to levels seen in pre-diabetes. Practical priorities include consistent sleep timing, dark and cool sleeping environments, avoidance of late caffeine and alcohol, and exposure to bright light early in the day [29,30].
Sunlight, within sensible limits, is similarly underappreciated. Morning sunlight on the eyes anchors the circadian system, producing earlier melatonin onset and improving sleep that night [29,32]. Sunlight on the skin produces vitamin D, deficiency of which is associated with cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and impaired immune function. Counter to long-standing dermatologic advice, large cohort studies suggest that complete sun avoidance carries its own mortality risk, comparable in magnitude to smoking. The reasonable middle path is regular, moderate sun exposure adequate to maintain vitamin D status without inviting burns or excessive UV damage [31,32].
Hydration affects every cellular process. Mild dehydration impairs cognition, exercise performance, and thermoregulation, and chronic underhydration is associated with chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular events. Most adults benefit from drinking water proactively rather than relying on thirst, especially with age, since the thirst response itself diminishes over decades [33].
Psychological stress, when chronic, becomes a metabolic and inflammatory stimulus indistinguishable in its effects from a poor diet. Sustained activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis raises cortisol, drives visceral fat deposition, impairs sleep, and amplifies systemic inflammation. Practices that reliably reduce stress reactivity, including meditation, time in nature, structured breathing, exercise, and meaningful work, therefore belong in any longevity strategy [25,28,43].
Finally, social connection is a measurable longevity factor in its own right. A meta-analysis of 148 studies covering more than 300,000 individuals found that strong social relationships were associated with a 50% increase in survival, an effect comparable to smoking cessation and exceeding that of physical inactivity or obesity . The Blue Zones, global regions with exceptional longevity, share strong family and community bonds as a defining feature. Loneliness, by contrast, behaves biologically like a chronic stressor, elevating inflammation and accelerating cognitive decline [34,35,42].
The compound effect of these everyday habits is more powerful than any single intervention. They share a common mechanism: each one nudges the body toward stable insulin signalling, healthy cortisol rhythms, low inflammation, and adequate repair. Practiced together, year after year, they constitute the most evidence-based longevity prescription currently available [10,35].
Tracking Health Markers: Measuring Biological Age and Functional Reserve
Chronological age, the number of years since birth, correlates only loosely with health. Biological age, by contrast, captures how well the body’s systems are functioning relative to expected norms, and increasingly drives clinical decision-making in preventive medicine. The good news is that several reliable, accessible markers track biological aging, allowing individuals and clinicians to monitor progress over time [36-40,45].
Insulin sensitivity is arguably the most upstream marker. Fasting insulin (often more informative than fasting glucose), the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and oral glucose tolerance with paired insulin measurements reveal early dysregulation years before fasting glucose abnormalities appear. Continuous glucose monitors, originally developed for diabetes management, are now used by metabolically healthy individuals to identify foods, meal timings, and activities that produce excessive glucose excursions. Tracking insulin sensitivity is among the most actionable longevity practices because diet and exercise can shift these markers in weeks to months [5,9,12,16,17,21].
Resting heart rate (RHR) and heart rate variability (HRV) reflect autonomic nervous system tone and cardiovascular fitness [18,40]. A consistently low RHR (45 to 60 beats per minute in trained adults) and a stable, age-appropriate HRV indicate parasympathetic dominance and good recovery capacity. Wearable devices have made these metrics inexpensive to track continuously, and trends over weeks are more informative than single measurements.
VO2 max, the maximum rate of oxygen consumption during exercise, is the gold standard cardiorespiratory marker and one of the strongest mortality predictors in clinical medicine. While direct measurement requires laboratory equipment, reasonable estimates can be obtained from submaximal field tests, treadmill protocols, and many fitness wearables. The American Heart Association has formally endorsed cardiorespiratory fitness as a clinical vital sign [23,40].
Grip strength is a simple, inexpensive measure of total-body strength and a remarkably robust mortality predictor. Hand-held dynamometers, available for under $50, allow individuals to track grip strength quarterly. Sustained age-related decline can prompt targeted intervention well before frailty becomes clinically apparent [38,39].
Cognitive sharpness, including processing speed, working memory, and executive function, can be tracked with validated digital assessments. Subjective markers (mental clarity, mood stability, sleep quality) provide complementary signals. Cognitive decline that exceeds the normal age-related trajectory is among the earliest signs that metabolic, vascular, or sleep factors require attention [42].
Body composition is more meaningful than weight alone. Visceral adiposity, lean muscle mass, and bone density (assessed by DEXA scan or bioelectrical impedance) provide a more accurate picture of metabolic and structural health than BMI. A stable or increasing lean mass with declining visceral fat is a hallmark of successful aging [12,19,41].
Increasingly, epigenetic clocks, based on DNA methylation patterns at specific CpG sites, provide direct estimates of biological age. Tools such as the GrimAge and PhenoAge algorithms have been validated against mortality outcomes and may eventually become routine clinical tools, though they currently require commercial testing and careful interpretation [36,37].
The unifying insight from these markers is that biological age is plastic. Studies of identical twins discordant for lifestyle, of intentional behaviours change interventions, and of pharmacologic geroprotectors all demonstrate that the trajectory of aging can be slowed and, in some respects, partially reversed. The first step is measurement: what gets measured tends to improve, particularly when paired with intelligent feedback [36,37,45].
Adapting to Thrive: A Lifelong Practice of Metabolic Stewardship
Longevity, properly understood, is not the avoidance of death but the cultivation of a body capable of thriving across decades. The science is now clear: the people who live longest, with the most function and the least disease, are not the most restrictive or the most obsessive. They are people whose bodies retain metabolic flexibility, whose hormones remain in coherent communication, whose tissues are regularly used and recovered, and whose lives are embedded in meaningful relationships and purpose [10,11,35].
The thread connecting these qualities is metabolic stewardship: the deliberate cultivation of stable insulin signalling, low chronic inflammation, and adaptive energy use over a lifetime. The strategies that achieve this are now well established and remarkably consistent across the literature. They include eating real food in moderate amounts within a sensible window; moving the body daily across the dimensions of strength, cardiovascular fitness, and balance; sleeping deeply and regularly; spending time outdoors; managing stress proactively; and remaining socially engaged [10,11,14,18,25,29,30,34,35].
None of these interventions individually transforms biology. Their power lies in their compounding interaction, sustained over time. Consider the synergy: resistance training improves insulin sensitivity, which improves sleep, which restores growth hormone, which preserves muscle mass, which improves insulin sensitivity further. Each habit reinforces the others, and the accumulated effect across years is far greater than the sum of the parts. This is why short-term interventions, a 30-day cleanse, a quarterly diet, an annual physical, are so much less effective than the unremarkable consistency of daily practice [21,27,29].
Importantly, this framework rejects the false dichotomy between scientific rigor and human flourishing. The longevity-promoting life is not one of grim restriction but one of awareness. Periods of fasting are balanced by satisfying meals; intense exercise is balanced by deep recovery; engaged work is balanced by genuine rest; solitude is balanced by community. The body is built for cycles, and respecting those cycles, rather than overriding them with constant stimulation, constant feeding, and constant stress, is the foundational principle of healthy aging [11,14,29,44].
For clinicians, researchers, and developers building tools in the wellness and longevity space, the practical implication is that interventions should support these natural rhythms rather than replace them. Continuous glucose monitors that promote awareness without pathologizing variability; sleep trackers that emphasize regularity rather than perfection; resistance training programs scaled to ability; community-based programs that combine accountability with companionship; AI-driven feedback that translates complex biomarker data into intuitive guidance: these are the interventions most likely to produce durable behaviour change and meaningful improvements in health span.
For individuals, the message is empowering. Aging is not entirely under our control, but a substantial fraction of biological aging is. The decisions made in any given week, how much to move, what to eat, when to sleep, with whom to spend time, how to manage stress, are the inputs from which the body constructs its future health. Compounded across decades, those decisions shape whether one’s seventies and eighties are a slow contraction or a continued expansion of capacity.
The destination is not merely more years, but more life within those years. Longevity, in its highest form, is the art of remaining adaptable, metabolically, hormonally, physically, cognitively, and socially, so that the body can meet whatever decades lie ahead with vitality and grace [1,2,11,42].
Reference
1. Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243-78.
2. Kennedy BK, Berger SL, Brunet A, Campisi J, Cuervo AM, Epel ES, et al. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell. 2014;159(4):709-13.
3. Kenyon CJ. The genetics of ageing. Nature. 2010;464(7288):504-12.
4. Barzilai N, Huffman DM, Muzumdar RH, Bartke A. The critical role of metabolic pathways in aging. Diabetes. 2012;61(6):1315-22.
5. Reaven GM. Banting Lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37(12):1595-607.
6. Shulman GI. Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2000;106(2):171-6.
7. Kraft JR. Diabetes Epidemic and You. Bloomington (IN): Trafford Publishing; 2008.
8. Crofts CAP, Zinn C, Wheldon MC, Schofield GM. Hyperinsulinemia: a unifying theory of chronic disease? Diabesity. 2015;1(4):34-43.
9. Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(4):2133-223.
10. Rajpathak SN, Liu Y, Ben-David O, Reddy S, Atzmon G, Crandall J, et al. Lifestyle factors of people with exceptional longevity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1509-12.
11. Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo VD. Extending healthy life span: from yeast to humans. Science. 2010;328(5976):321-6.
12. Goodpaster BH, Sparks LM. Metabolic flexibility in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25(5):1027-36.
13. Smith RL, Soeters MR, Wust RCI, Houtkooper RH. Metabolic flexibility as an adaptation to energy resources and requirements in health and disease. Endocr Rev. 2018;39(4):489-517.
14. de Cabo R, Mattson MP. Effects of intermittent fasting on health, aging, and disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2541-51.
15. Patterson RE, Sears DD. Metabolic effects of intermittent fasting. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:371-93.
16. Ludwig DS. The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2002;287(18):2414-23.
17. Augustin LSA, Kendall CWC, Jenkins DJA, Willett WC, Astrup A, Barclay AW, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: an International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25(9):795-815.
18. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334-59.
19. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31.
20. Westcott WL. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11(4):209-16.
21. Holloszy JO. Exercise-induced increase in muscle insulin sensitivity. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;99(1):338-43.
22. Kraschnewski JL, Sciamanna CN, Poger JM, Rovniak LS, Lehman EB, Cooper AB, et al. Is strength training associated with mortality benefits? A 15-year cohort study of US older adults. Prev Med. 2016;87:121-7.
23. Mandsager K, Harb S, Cremer P, Phelan D, Nissen SE, Jaber W. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with long-term mortality among adults undergoing exercise treadmill testing. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(6):e183605.
24. Vingren JL, Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Anderson JM, Volek JS, Maresh CM. Testosterone physiology in resistance exercise and training: the up-stream regulatory elements. Sports Med. 2010;40(12):1037-53.
25. Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(7):374-81.
26. Friedman JM, Halaas JL. Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature. 1998;395(6704):763-70.
27. Veldhuis JD, Iranmanesh A, Bowers CY. Joint mechanisms of impaired growth-hormone pulse renewal in aging men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(7):4177-83.
28. Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, Giuliani C, Santoro A. Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(10):576-90.
29. Walker MP. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams. New York: Scribner; 2017.
30. Cappuccio FP, D’Elia L, Strazzullo P, Miller MA. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep. 2010;33(5):585-92.
31. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266-81.
32. Lindqvist PG, Epstein E, Nielsen K, Landin-Olsson M, Ingvar C, Olsson H. Avoidance of sun exposure as a risk factor for major causes of death: a competing risk analysis of the Melanoma in Southern Sweden cohort. J Intern Med. 2016;280(4):375-87.
33. Popkin BM, D’Anci KE, Rosenberg IH. Water, hydration, and health. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(8):439-58.
34. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316.
35. Buettner D, Skemp S. Blue Zones: lessons from the world’s longest lived. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016;10(5):318-21.
36. Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, Chen BH, Assimes TL, Bandinelli S, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10(4):573-91.
37. Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(6):371-84.
38. Bohannon RW. Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):3-10.
39. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A Jr, Orlandini A, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266-73.
40. Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Despres JP, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(24):e653-99.
41. Strasser B, Volaklis K, Fuchs D, Burtscher M. Role of dietary protein and muscular fitness on longevity and aging. Aging Dis. 2018;9(1):119-32.
42. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413-46.
43. Kim ES, Hagan KA, Grodstein F, DeMeo DL, De Vivo I, Kubzansky LD. Optimism and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(1):21-9.
44. Mattson MP, Moehl K, Ghena N, Schmaedick M, Cheng A. Intermittent metabolic switching, neuroplasticity and brain health. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(2):63-80.
45. Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, Cohen HJ, Corcoran DL, Danese A, et al. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(30):E4104-10.